Literature DB >> 30255862

Predictors of Clinically Significant Echocardiography Findings in Older Adults with Syncope: A Secondary Analysis.

Marc A Probst1, Thomas A Gibson2, Robert E Weiss2, Annick N Yagapen3, Susan E Malveau3, David H Adler4, Aveh Bastani5, Christopher W Baugh6, Jeffrey M Caterino7, Carol L Clark8, Deborah B Diercks9, Judd E Hollander10, Bret A Nicks11, Daniel K Nishijima12, Manish N Shah13, Kirk A Stiffler14, Alan B Storrow15, Scott T Wilber14, Benjamin C Sun3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Syncope is a common reason for visiting the emergency department (ED) and is associated with significant healthcare resource utilization.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a risk-stratification tool for clinically significant findings on echocardiography among older adults presenting to the ED with syncope or nearsyncope.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study from April 2013 to September 2016.
SETTING: Eleven EDs in the United States. PATIENTS: We enrolled adults (=60 years) who presented to the ED with syncope or near-syncope who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a clinically significant finding on TTE. Clinical, electrocardiogram, and laboratory variables were also collected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of significant findings on echocardiography.
RESULTS: A total of 3,686 patients were enrolled. Of these, 995 (27%) received echocardiography, and 215 (22%) had a significant finding on echocardiography. Regression analysis identified five predictors of significant finding: (1) history of congestive heart failure, (2) history of coronary artery disease, (3) abnormal electrocardiogram, (4) high-sensitivity troponin-T >14 pg/mL, and 5) N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide >125 pg/mL. These five variables make up the ROMEO (Risk Of Major Echocardiography findings in Older adults with syncope) criteria. The sensitivity of a ROMEO score of zero for excluding significant findings on echocardiography was 99.5% (95% CI: 97.4%-99.9%) with a specificity of 15.4% (95% CI: 13.0%-18.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: If validated, this risk-stratification tool could help clinicians determine which syncope patients are at very low risk of having clinically significant findings on echocardiography. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01802398.
© 2018 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30255862      PMCID: PMC6343846          DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  24 in total

1.  ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echocardiography, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Mario J Garcia; David E Haines; Wyman W Lai; Warren J Manning; Ayan R Patel; Michael H Picard; Donna M Polk; Michael Ragosta; R Parker Ward; Rory B Weiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Diagnosing syncope. Part 1: Value of history, physical examination, and electrocardiography. Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  M Linzer; E H Yang; N A Estes; P Wang; V R Vorperian; W N Kapoor
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Are echocardiography, telemetry, ambulatory electrocardiography monitoring, and cardiac enzymes in emergency department patients presenting with syncope useful tests? A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  David T Chiu; Nathan I Shapiro; Benjamin C Sun; J Lawrence Mottley; Shamai A Grossman
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Echocardiography in the evaluation of patients with syncope.

Authors:  D Recchia; B Barzilai
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Win-Kuang Shen; Robert S Sheldon; David G Benditt; Mitchell I Cohen; Daniel E Forman; Zachary D Goldberger; Blair P Grubb; Mohamed H Hamdan; Andrew D Krahn; Mark S Link; Brian Olshansky; Satish R Raj; Roopinder Kaur Sandhu; Dan Sorajja; Benjamin C Sun; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  National trends in resource utilization associated with ED visits for syncope.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Hemal K Kanzaria; Misato Gbedemah; Lynne D Richardson; Benjamin C Sun
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

8.  Things We Do For No Reason: Echocardiogram in Unselected Patients with Syncope.

Authors:  Charles L Madeira; Michael J Craig; Andrew Donohoe; John R Stephens
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.960

9.  Priorities for emergency department syncope research.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Giorgio Costantino; Franca Barbic; Ilaria Bossi; Giovanni Casazza; Franca Dipaola; Daniel McDermott; James Quinn; Matthew Reed; Robert S Sheldon; Monica Solbiati; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Andrew D Krahn; Daniel Beach; Nicolai Bodemer; Michele Brignole; Ivo Casagranda; Piergiorgio Duca; Greta Falavigna; Roberto Ippoliti; Nicola Montano; Brian Olshansky; Satish R Raj; Martin H Ruwald; Win-Kuang Shen; Ian Stiell; Andrea Ungar; J Gert van Dijk; Nynke van Dijk; Wouter Wieling; Raffaello Furlan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Syncope of unknown origin. The need for a more cost-effective approach to its diagnosis evaluation.

Authors:  W N Kapoor; M Karpf; Y Maher; R A Miller; G S Levey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Rational Evaluation of the Syncope Patient: Optimizing the Emergency Department Visit.

Authors:  Tarek Hatoum; Robert S Sheldon
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.