Literature DB >> 3598006

Electrophysiologic testing in patients with unexplained syncope: clinical and noninvasive predictors of outcome.

R B Krol, F Morady, G C Flaker, L A DiCarlo, J M Baerman, J Hewett, M de Buitleir.   

Abstract

To assess whether the level of risk of having significant electrophysiologic abnormalities can be determined, 29 clinical variables were analyzed in 104 patients with unexplained syncope who underwent electrophysiologic testing. A positive electrophysiologic study was defined as: a sinus node recovery time greater than or equal to 3 seconds; HV interval greater than or equal to 100 ms; infranodal block during atrial pacing; unimorphic ventricular tachycardia; and supraventricular tachycardia associated with hypotension. Thirty-one patients had a positive study, with inducible ventricular tachycardia being the most common finding (71% of positive studies). A left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 0.40 was the most powerful predictor of a positive electrophysiologic study (p less than 0.00001), followed by the presence of bundle branch block (p less than 0.00003), coronary artery disease (p less than 0.0003), remote myocardial infarction (p less than 0.00006), use of type 1 antiarrhythmic drugs (p less than 0.00003), injury related to loss of consciousness (p less than 0.01) and male sex (p less than 0.01). A negative electrophysiologic study was associated with an ejection fraction greater than 0.40 (p less than 0.00001), the absence of structural heart disease (p less than 0.00001), a normal electrocardiogram (ECG) (p less than 0.0001) and normal ambulatory ECG monitoring (p less than 0.0001). The probability of a negative study increased as the number and duration of syncopal episodes increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3598006     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80019-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  15 in total

Review 1.  Important points in the clinical evaluation of patients with syncope.

Authors:  W Arthur; G C Kaye
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  [Electrophysiologic diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  Guido Ritscher; Helge Simon; Georg Nölker; Johannes Brachmann; Anil-Martin Sinha
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  Evaluation of syncope.

Authors:  M Yousuf Kanjwal; Blair P Grubb
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Score indices for predicting electrophysiologic outcomes in patients with unexplained syncope.

Authors:  Lin Y Chen; Arshad Jahangir; Wyatt W Decker; Peter A Smars; Wouter Wieling; David O Hodge; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen C Hammill; Win-Kuang Shen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Clinical features of adenosine sensitive syncope and tilt induced vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  M Brignole; G Gaggioli; C Menozzi; A Del Rosso; S Costa; A Bartoletti; N Bottoni; G Lolli
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Does syncope require rhythmic and non-rhythmic evaluation in patients with previous MI?

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; C Suty-Selton; F Alla; P Y Zinzius; H Blangy; B Azman; A Terrier de la Chaise; P Louis; L Groben; K Djaballah; O Selton; S Magalhaes; L Muresan; J Cedano; A Abdelaal; N Sadoul
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2010-07-29

Review 7.  Collapse query cause: the management of adult syncope in the emergency department.

Authors:  M J Reed; A Gray
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Predicting the outcomes of electrophysiologic studies of patients with unexplained syncope: preliminary validation of a derived model.

Authors:  M Linzer; E N Prystowsky; G W Divine; D B Matchar; G Samsa; F Harrell; J C Pressley; D B Pryor
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Role of echocardiography in the evaluation of syncope: a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Sarasin; A-F Junod; D Carballo; S Slama; P-F Unger; M Louis-Simonet
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Predictors of 30-day serious events in older patients with syncope.

Authors:  Benjamin C Sun; Stephen F Derose; Li-Jung Liang; Gelareh Z Gabayan; Jerome R Hoffman; Alison A Moore; William R Mower; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.