Literature DB >> 12226606

Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets.

Olivier Sorel1, Rafeh El Alam, Francis Chagneau, Guy Cathelineau.   

Abstract

The aims of the current study were to evaluate the bond strength of a new metallic orthodontic bracket with a laser structured base (Discovery, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany), and its effects on the site of bond failure and on the behavior of the enamel after debonding. One hundred and twenty recently extracted human premolars were bonded with 1 of 2 types of mechanical interlock base metal brackets: a standard system with a simple foil mesh pad (Minitrim, Dentaurum) and the Discovery bracket. A resin-based, chemically activated bonding system, No-mix (Dentaurum), was used as the adhesive system in this trial. The teeth were immersed in normal saline solution at 37 degrees C for 7 days before debonding and were randomly assigned to different subgroups. A testing machine was used to evaluate tensile and fatigue bond strengths for both brackets. After debonding, the amount of residual adhesive on the bracket and enamel detachment were assessed according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and the enamel detachment index (EDI) with a scanning electron microscope and an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer. The scores obtained from the ARI and the EDI showed that the laser structured base brackets had a significantly higher bond strength (mean +/- SD: 17.1 +/- 0.7 MPa) that was 2 times higher than that observed with the simple foil mesh brackets (mean +/- SD: 8.7 +/- 1.4 MPa) (P <.001). Bond failure with the laser structured base was at the enamel-adhesive interface with an ARI score of 3 in 80% of the teeth, and bond failure with the simple foil mesh base was at the bracket-adhesive interface with an ARI score of 0 in 75% of the teeth. A small area, with less than 10% of the enamel damaged (1 on the EDI) and 1.5 microm in thickness, was observed for both brackets. The laser structured base bracket's bond strength was double that of the simple foil mesh bracket but was equally safe and did not induce significant enamel detachment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226606     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.125834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  14 in total

1.  In vitro cyclic shear fatigue of the bracket-adhesive complex: a pilot study.

Authors:  N Daratsianos; A Jäger; T Eliades; C Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  The influence of adhesives and the base structure of metal brackets on shear bond strength.

Authors:  Susanne Reimann; Judith Mezey; Nikolaos Daratsianos; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Effects of enamel sealing on shear bond strength and the adhesive remnant index : Study of three fluoride-releasing adhesives in combination with metal and ceramic brackets.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hofmann; Laura Elsner; Ursula Hirschfelder; Thomas Ebert; Sebastian Hanke
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Evaluation of bovine and human teeth exposed to thermocycling for microleakage under bonded metal brackets.

Authors:  Kerem Canbek; Mareike Karbach; Franziska Gottschalk; Christina Erbe; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Bracket base remnants after orthodontic debonding.

Authors:  Matteo Zanarini; Antonio Gracco; Monica Lattuca; Silvia Marchionni; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Effect of bracket base design on shear bond strength to feldspathic porcelain.

Authors:  Kazem Dalaie; Armin Mirfasihi; Solmaz Eskandarion; Sattar Kabiri
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Shear bond strength of ceramic and metallic orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer and conventional bonding adhesives.

Authors:  Valiollah Arash; Fatemeh Naghipour; Mehdi Ravadgar; Ahmad Karkhah; Mohammad Saleh Barati
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-01-25

8.  Three-dimensional non-destructive visualization of teeth enamel microcracks using X-ray micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Irma Dumbryte; Arturas Vailionis; Edvinas Skliutas; Saulius Juodkazis; Mangirdas Malinauskas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Orthodontic molar brackets: the effect of three different base designs on shear bond strength.

Authors:  Athol P Hudson; Sias R Grobler; Angela M P Harris
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-03

10.  The influence of no-primer adhesives and anchor pylons bracket bases on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Maria Francesca Sfondrini; Danilo Fraticelli; Paola Daina; Alessandra Tamagnone; Paola Gandini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.