Elisabeth Hofmann1, Laura Elsner2, Ursula Hirschfelder2, Thomas Ebert2, Sebastian Hanke2. 1. Department of Orthodontics and Orofacial Orthopedics, Zahnklinik 3-Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Glückstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. elisabeth.hofmann@uk-erlangen.de. 2. Department of Orthodontics and Orofacial Orthopedics, Zahnklinik 3-Kieferorthopädie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Glückstrasse 11, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Selected combinations of materials were used to create tooth-adhesive-bracket complexes to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) with regard to enamel sealing. METHODS: Four adhesive systems also appropriate for use as enamel sealants were combined with four bracket types, resulting in 16 adhesive-bracket combinations, each of which was tested on 15 permanent bovine incisors. Sealant-adhesives included two recently introduced fluoride-releasing systems (Riva bond LC® and go!®), one established primer (Opal® Seal™), and one commonly used adhesive as control (Transbond™ XT). Brackets included two metal (discovery® by Dentaurum and Sprint®) and two ceramic (discovery® pearl and GLAM®) systems. After embedding the bovine teeth, bonding the brackets to their surface, and storing the resultant samples as per DIN 13990-2 with modifications, an SBS test was performed by applying the shear force directly at the bracket base in an incisocervical direction. Then the ARI scores were determined. RESULTS: Discovery® + Transbond™ XT yielded the highest (47.2 MPa) and GLAM® + go!® the lowest (17.0 MPa) mean SBS values. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were found between metal and ceramic brackets of the same manufacturers (Dentaurum and Forestadent). Our ratings of the failure modes upon debonding predominantly yielded ARI 0 or 1. The high SBS values and low ARI scores observed with discovery® + Transbond XT™ were reflected in a high rate of enamel fracture, which occurred on 11 of the 15 tooth specimens in this group. CONCLUSIONS: All sealant-bracket combinations were found to yield levels of SBS adequate for clinical application. SBS values and ARI scores varied significantly depending on which sealant-brackets were used.
OBJECTIVES: Selected combinations of materials were used to create tooth-adhesive-bracket complexes to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) with regard to enamel sealing. METHODS: Four adhesive systems also appropriate for use as enamel sealants were combined with four bracket types, resulting in 16 adhesive-bracket combinations, each of which was tested on 15 permanent bovine incisors. Sealant-adhesives included two recently introduced fluoride-releasing systems (Riva bond LC® and go!®), one established primer (Opal® Seal™), and one commonly used adhesive as control (Transbond™ XT). Brackets included two metal (discovery® by Dentaurum and Sprint®) and two ceramic (discovery® pearl and GLAM®) systems. After embedding the bovine teeth, bonding the brackets to their surface, and storing the resultant samples as per DIN 13990-2 with modifications, an SBS test was performed by applying the shear force directly at the bracket base in an incisocervical direction. Then the ARI scores were determined. RESULTS: Discovery® + Transbond™ XT yielded the highest (47.2 MPa) and GLAM® + go!® the lowest (17.0 MPa) mean SBS values. Significant differences (p < 0.0001) were found between metal and ceramic brackets of the same manufacturers (Dentaurum and Forestadent). Our ratings of the failure modes upon debonding predominantly yielded ARI 0 or 1. The high SBS values and low ARI scores observed with discovery® + Transbond XT™ were reflected in a high rate of enamel fracture, which occurred on 11 of the 15 tooth specimens in this group. CONCLUSIONS: All sealant-bracket combinations were found to yield levels of SBS adequate for clinical application. SBS values and ARI scores varied significantly depending on which sealant-brackets were used.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bracket; Failure mode; Sealants; Shear bond strength