Literature DB >> 12226583

Improving informed consent: insights from behavioral decision research.

Margaret Holmes-Rovner1, Celia E Wills.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With publication of The Belmont Report concerning ethical principles, informed consent gained explicit guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. However, there is still little evidence about how well informed consent works to assist patients to reach informed decisions about research participation.
OBJECTIVE: To review behavioral decision theory and research to identify implications for informed consent. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Traditional literature review and hand search of literature were used.
RESULTS: Psychological research on biases and heuristics identifies cognitive biases in information processing (selection and interpretation of risks and benefits) that have implications for improving the informing process. A growing literature on patient decision aids provides evidence for the feasibility of more fully informing patients, and includes examples of "debiasing" procedures (to improve information comprehension and consent).
CONCLUSIONS: Informing and consenting involve conceptually different challenges concerning effectiveness versus values. Debiasing techniques need to be developed and empirically tested to determine their effectiveness in informing patients. Consenting involves both social and individual values. Appealing to altruism when summarizing the goals of research may increase research participation and does not necessarily violate voluntariness of informed consent. Additional research is needed to determine when information-processing biases occur problematically in health-related informed consent, and whether appealing to altruism increases research participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226583     DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023953.55783.4A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Likely consequences of increased patient choice.

Authors:  Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Clin Psychol (New York)       Date:  2006

3.  Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk.

Authors:  Robin Lee; Samantha Lampert; Lynn Wilder; Anne L Sowell
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Is it ethical to use placebos in osteoporosis clinical trials?

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Is it ethical to use placebos in osteoporosis clinical trials?

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Treatment decision-making and the form of risk communication: results of a factorial survey.

Authors:  Larry A Hembroff; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Celia E Wills
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Testing decision-making competency of schizophrenia participants in clinical trials. A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Sorin Hostiuc; Mugurel Constantin Rusu; Ionut Negoi; Eduard Drima
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.630

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.