Literature DB >> 12222862

Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system.

P Cadman1, R Bassalow, N P S Sidhu, G Ibbott, A Nelson.   

Abstract

Commercial multileaf collimator (MLC) systems can employ leaves with rounded ends. Treatment planning beam modelling should consider the effects of transmission through rounded leaf ends to provide accurate dosimetry for IMRT treatments delivered with segmented MLC. We determined that an MLC leaf gap reduction of 1.4 mm is required to obtain an agreement between calculated and measured profile 50% dose points. A head and neck dosimetry phantom, supplied by the Radiological Physics Center (RPC), was planned and irradiated as a necessary credentialing requirement for the RTOG H-0022 protocol. The agreement between the RPC TLD measurements and treatment planning calculations was within experimental error for the primary and secondary planning target volumes (PTVs); however, the calculated mean dose for the critical structure was approximately 9% lower than the RPC TLD measurements. RPC radiochromic film profile measurements also indicated significant discrepancies (>5%) with calculated values especially in the high dose gradient region in the vicinity of the critical structure. These results substantiate our own in-house phantom measurements, performed with the same IMRT fields as for the RPC phantom experiment, using Kodak EDR2 film to measure absolute dose. Our results indicate a maximum underestimate of calculated dose of 12% with no leaf gap reduction. The discrepancy between measured and calculated phantom values is reduced to +/- 5% when a leaf gap reduction of 1.4 mm is used. A further improvement in the accuracy of dose calculation is not possible without a more accurate modelling of the leaf end transmission by the planning system. In the absence of published dosimetric criteria for IMRT our results stress the need for stringent in-house dosimetric QA and validation for IMRT treatments. We found the dosimetric validation service provided by the RPC to be a valuable component of our IMRT validation efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12222862     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/16/314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Measuring output factors of small fields formed by collimator jaws and multileaf collimator using plastic scintillation detectors.

Authors:  David M Klein; Ramesh C Tailor; Louis Archambault; Lilie Wang; Francois Therriault-Proulx; A Sam Beddar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The change of response of ionization chambers in the penumbra and transmission regions: impact for IMRT verification.

Authors:  D González-Castaño; J Pena; F Sánchez-Doblado; G H Hartmann; F Gómez; A Leal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Credentialing results from IMRT irradiations of an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Andrea Molineu; Nadia Hernandez; Trang Nguyen; Geoffrey Ibbott; David Followill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Experimental validation of deterministic Acuros XB algorithm for IMRT and VMAT dose calculations with the Radiological Physics Center's head and neck phantom.

Authors:  Tao Han; Firas Mourtada; Kelly Kisling; Justin Mikell; David Followill; Rebecca Howell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Challenges in credentialing institutions and participants in advanced technology multi-institutional clinical trials.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ibbott; David S Followill; H Andrea Molineu; Jessica R Lowenstein; Paola E Alvarez; Joye E Roll
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Quality assurance for clinical trials.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ibbott; Annette Haworth; David S Followill
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Validation of physics improvements for IMRT with a commercial treatment-planning system.

Authors:  Patrick Cadman; Todd McNutt; Karl Bzdusek
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Optimizing the MLC model parameters for IMRT in the RayStation treatment planning system.

Authors:  Shifeng Chen; Byong Yong Yi; Xiaocheng Yang; Huijun Xu; Karl L Prado; Warren D D'Souza
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Inter-unit variability of multi-leaf collimator parameters for IMRT and VMAT treatment planning: a multi-institutional survey.

Authors:  Masaru Isono; Yuichi Akino; Hirokazu Mizuno; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Norihisa Masai; Toshijiro Yamamoto
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Evaluation of a biplanar diode array dosimeter for quality assurance of step-and-shoot IMRT.

Authors:  Vladimir Feygelman; Kenneth Forster; Daniel Opp; Görgen Nilsson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.