Literature DB >> 12220800

The reactions to research participation questionnaires for children and for parents (RRPQ-C and RRPQ-P).

Nancy Kassam-Adams1, Elana Newman.   

Abstract

Systematic assessment of the effect of clinical research studies on child and parent participants has been limited. Such assessment could provide an empirical basis for the ethical conduct of research, assisting investigators and institutional review boards in balancing the need for sound research with the need to protect study participants. The Reactions to Research Participation Questionnaire for Children (RRPQ-C) and the RRPQ for Parents (RRPQ-P) are brief measures designed to assess child or parent views of clinical research studies. Both measures were piloted and then administered as part of an interview-based study of traumatically injured children and their parents, to assess their psychometric properties and potential usefulness as addenda to future study protocols. The RRPQ-C and RRPQ-P each demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. Exploratory factor analyses provided general support for their conceptual basis. Both were easily administered and well-accepted by respondents. There is evidence that children and adults were willing to answer honestly, even about negative responses. Brief measures such as the RRPQ-C and RRPQ-P may provide a practical and empirically informed method for assessing children's and parents' responses to research participation. Investigators should consider including systematic standardized assessment of participant reactions in child clinical research studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12220800     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(02)00200-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  18 in total

1.  Is Participating in Psychological Research a Benefit, Burden, or Both for Medically Ill Youth and Their Caregivers?.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Haven Battles; Sima Zadeh; Maryland Pao
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Review of measurement instruments in clinical and research ethics, 1999-2003.

Authors:  B K Redman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Trauma-sensitive yoga as an adjunct mental health treatment in group therapy for survivors of domestic violence: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Cari Jo Clark; Angela Lewis-Dmello; Deena Anders; Amy Parsons; Viann Nguyen-Feng; Lisa Henn; David Emerson
Journal:  Complement Ther Clin Pract       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.446

4.  Interview and recollection-based research with child disaster survivors: Participation-related changes in emotion and perceptions of participation.

Authors:  Erin P Hambrick; Bridget M O'Connor; Eric M Vernberg
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2015-09-21

5.  Seriously Injured Urban Black Men's Perceptions of Clinical Research Participation.

Authors:  Marta M Bruce; Connie M Ulrich; Nancy Kassam-Adams; Therese S Richmond
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-12-22

6.  Prior Trauma Exposure for Youth in Treatment Foster Care.

Authors:  Shannon Dorsey; Barbara J Burns; Dannia G Southerland; Julia Revillion Cox; H Ryan Wagner; Elizabeth M Z Farmer
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2012-10

7.  Participant reactions to a pretreatment research assessment during a treatment outcome study for PTSD.

Authors:  Patricia A Resick; Katherine M Iverson; Caroline E Artz
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2009-08

8.  Emotional risks to respondents in survey research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson; Michael Fendrich; Norah C Feeny
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Perceived Risks and Benefits in IPV and HIV Research: Listening to the Voices of HIV-Positive African American Women.

Authors:  Nicole M Overstreet; Mukadder Okuyan; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 10.  Ethics of research on survivors of trauma.

Authors:  Soraya Seedat; Willem P Pienaar; David Williams; Daniel J Stein
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.