Literature DB >> 12218970

Endograft migration one to four years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the AneuRx device: a cautionary note.

Michael S Conners1, W Charles Sternbergh, Glen Carter, Britt H Tonnessen, Moises Yoselevitz, Samuel R Money.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positional stability of the endograft is essential for long-term durability after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR). However, the cumulative risk of delayed endograft migration has been sparsely reported.
METHOD: A total of 91 patients studied underwent EAR with the AneuRx endograft with a minimum 1 year from implantation. Data from a prospective database were assessed for proximal endograft migration, defined as > or = 5 mm change from the initial endograft position. Multiple anatomic characteristics were also examined. Sixty-nine patients were alive, with complete follow-up at 1 year, with a mean time from implantation of 33.2 +/- 1.1 months. Data are mean +/- SEM.
RESULTS: Endograft migration occurred in 15 patients, giving a cumulative event rate of 7.2% (5/69) at 1 year, 20.4% (10/49) at 2 years, 42.1% (8/19) at 3 years, and 66.7% (2/3) at 4 years post-EAR (P =.01). Although the initial aortic neck diameter did not differ between the groups (21.5 +/- 0.6 mm vs 21.8 +/- 0.3 mm, P =.61), significant (P <.05), late aortic neck enlargement was seen in patients with migration (25.0 +/- 1.6 mm, 26.2 +/- 1.2 mm, and 27.0 +/- 1.0 mm at 1,2, and 3 years, respectively) but not in nonmigrators. Regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant (P <.05) correlation between endograft oversizing and late aortic neck dilation. Overall migration risk was 29.2% in patients oversized >20% and 18.6% in patients oversized < or = 20%. Aortic neck angulation (23.4 +/- 6.6 degrees vs 23.5 +/- 3.3 degrees, P =.99), aortic neck length (25.9 +/- 2.5 mm vs 27.0 +/- 1.6 mm, P =.74), initial endograft/aortic neck overlap (18.6 +/- 2.6 mm vs 19.4 +/- 1.4 mm, P =.80) and size of abdominal aortic aneurysm (55.5 +/- 1.5 mm vs 54.9 +/- 1.4 mm, P =.84) were similar between migrators and nonmigrators, respectively. Secondary endovascular treatment with aortic cuffs was required in five patients with device migration.
CONCLUSIONS: Device migration after EAR with the AneuRx endograft occurred with significant frequency, the incidence of which increased with the length of follow-up. Late aortic neck dilation was significantly associated with migration. Oversizing of the endograft of >20% may accelerate this late aortic neck dilation. However, the etiologies of endograft migration were likely multifactorial, as the majority (8/15) of patients experiencing migration were oversized <20%. Although endovascular repair of these migrations is usually possible, the long-term durability of these secondary procedures is unknown. Careful surveillance for this endograft failure mode must be an essential component of post-EAR follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12218970     DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.126561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  14 in total

1.  Role of aortic stent graft oversizing and barb characteristics on folding.

Authors:  Kathleen K Lin; Jarin A Kratzberg; Madhavan L Raghavan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  A computational study on the biomechanical factors related to stent-graft models in the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  S K Lam; George S K Fung; Stephen W K Cheng; K W Chow
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Recent publications by ochsner authors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2003

4.  Comparative study of clinical outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysms repair in large diameter aortic necks (>31 mm) versus smaller necks.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; Trevor DerDerian; Zachary T AbuRahma; Stephen M Hass; Michael Yacoub; L Scott Dean; Shadi Abu-Halimah; Albeir Y Mousa
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Treatment of complications following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  William Grande; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Abdominal aortic aneurysms in "high-risk" surgical patients: comparison of open and endovascular repair.

Authors:  William D Jordan; Francisco Alcocer; Douglas J Wirthlin; Andrew O Westfall; David Whitley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Comparison of Endovascular Stent Grafts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Dominique B Buck; Peter A Soden; Sarah E Deery; Sara L Zettervall; Klaas H J Ultee; Bruce E Landon; A James O'Malley; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 1.466

8.  A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of doxycycline after endoluminal aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Amy E Hackmann; Brian G Rubin; Luis A Sanchez; Patrick A Geraghty; Robert W Thompson; John A Curci
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms: a ten-year experience with 817 patients.

Authors:  Michael L Marin; Larry H Hollier; Sharif H Ellozy; David Spielvogel; Harold Mitty; Randall Griepp; Robert A Lookstein; Alfio Carroccio; Nicholas J Morrissey; Victoria J Teodorescu; Tikva S Jacobs; Michael E Minor; Claudie M Sheahan; Kristina Chae; Juliana Oak; Andrew Cha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Conical Neck Anatomy.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Lee; Ki Hyuk Park
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2017-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.