Literature DB >> 18618162

A computational study on the biomechanical factors related to stent-graft models in the thoracic aorta.

S K Lam1, George S K Fung, Stephen W K Cheng, K W Chow.   

Abstract

Endovascular aortic stent-graft is a new, minimally invasive procedure for treating thoracic aortic diseases, and has quickly evolved to be one of the standard treatments subject to anatomic constraints. This procedure involves the placement of a self-expanding stent-graft system in a high-flow thoracic aorta. Stent-graft deployment in the thoracic aorta, especially close to the aortic arch, normally experiences a significant drag force which might lead to the risk of stent-graft failure. A comprehensive investigation on the biomechanical factors affecting the drag force on a stent-graft in the thoracic aorta is thus in order, and the goal is to perform an in-depth study on the contributing biomechanical factors. Three factors affecting the deployed stent-graft are considered, namely, the internal diameter of the vessel, the starting position of the graft and the diameter of curvature of the aortic arch. Computational fluid dynamic techniques are applied to model the blood flow. The inlet velocity and outlet pressure are assumed to be pulsatile. The three-dimensional continuity equation and the time-dependent Navier-Stokes equations for an incompressible fluid were solved numerically. The drag force due to the change of momentum within the stent-graft and the shear stress were calculated and analyzed. The drag force on a stent-graft will depend critically on the internal diameter and the starting position of stent-graft deployment. Larger internal diameter leads to larger drag force and the stent-graft deployed at the more distal position may be associated with significantly diminished drag force. Smaller diameter of curvature of the aortic arch probably results in a decline of the drag force on the stent-graft, even though this factor merely causes only a modest difference. These findings may have important implications for the choice and design of stent-grafts in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18618162     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-008-0361-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  49 in total

1.  Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions.

Authors:  M S Olufsen; C S Peskin; W Y Kim; E M Pedersen; A Nadim; J Larsen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Unsteady and three-dimensional simulation of blood flow in the human aortic arch.

Authors:  N Shahcheraghi; H A Dwyer; A Y Cheer; A I Barakat; T Rutaganira
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  A mathematical model to predict the in vivo pulsatile drag forces acting on bifurcated stent grafts used in endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).

Authors:  L Morris; P Delassus; M Walsh; T McGloughlin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  3-D numerical simulation of blood flow through models of the human aorta.

Authors:  L Morris; P Delassus; A Callanan; M Walsh; F Wallis; P Grace; T McGloughlin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Toward an understanding of endoleaks and displacement forces.

Authors:  Thien V How
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.487

6.  Third International Summit on Thoracic Aortic Endografting: lessons from long-term results of thoracic stent-graft repairs.

Authors:  R Scott Mitchell; Shin Ishimaru; Frank J Criado; Marek P Ehrlich; Krassi Ivancev; Mario Lachat; Martin Malina; James May; Karl-Heinz Orend; Hervé Rousseau; David M Williams
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Time dependent non-Newtonian numerical study of the flow field in a realistic model of aortic arch.

Authors:  C Del Gaudio; U Morbiducci; M Grigioni
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.595

8.  Flow and stress characteristics in rigid walled and compliant carotid artery bifurcation models.

Authors:  K Perktold; E Thurner; T Kenner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Endograft migration one to four years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the AneuRx device: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Michael S Conners; W Charles Sternbergh; Glen Carter; Britt H Tonnessen; Moises Yoselevitz; Samuel R Money
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Fluid structure interaction of patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comparison with solid stress models.

Authors:  James H Leung; Andrew R Wright; Nick Cheshire; Jeremy Crane; Simon A Thom; Alun D Hughes; Yun Xu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary Role of Computational Analysis in Endovascular Treatment for Thoracic Aortic Disease.

Authors:  Guido H W van Bogerijen; Jip L Tolenaar; Michele Conti; Ferdinando Auricchio; Francesco Secchi; Francesco Sardanelli; Frans L Moll; Joost A van Herwaarden; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Santi Trimarchi
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2013-08-01

2.  Personalised imaging and biomechanical modelling of large vessels.

Authors:  Rob Krams; Marcel Breeuwer; Frans van de Vosse
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Magnitude and direction of pulsatile displacement forces acting on thoracic aortic endografts.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Charles A Taylor; Allen J Chiou; Victoria Yeh; Christopher K Zarins
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.487

4.  Importance of dynamic aortic evaluation in planning TEVAR.

Authors:  Guido H W van Bogerijen; Joost A van Herwaarden; Michele Conti; Ferdinando Auricchio; Vincenzo Rampoldi; Santi Trimarchi; Frans L Moll
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05

5.  Numerical investigation of patient-specific thoracic aortic aneurysms and comparison with normal subject via computational fluid dynamics (CFD).

Authors:  Mustafa Etli; Gokhan Canbolat; Oguz Karahan; Murat Koru
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Finite element analysis of helical flows in human aortic arch: a novel index.

Authors:  Cheng-Hung Lee; Kuo-Sheng Liu; Guan-Heng Jhong; Shih-Jung Liu; Ming-Yi Hsu; Chao-Jan Wang; Kuo-Chun Hung
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  The concept of aortic replacement based on computational fluid dynamic analysis: patient-directed aortic replacement.

Authors:  Laurant Heim; Robert J Poole; Richard Warwick; Michael Poullis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-13

8.  Endovascular ascending aortic repair in type A dissection: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yunus Ahmed; Ignas B Houben; C Alberto Figueroa; Nicholas S Burris; David M Williams; Frans L Moll; Himanshu J Patel; Joost A van Herwaarden
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.620

Review 9.  A perspective review on numerical simulations of hemodynamics in aortic dissection.

Authors:  Wan Naimah Wan Ab Naim; Poo Balan Ganesan; Zhonghua Sun; Kok Han Chee; Shahrul Amry Hashim; Einly Lim
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-03

10.  Blood flow in intracranial aneurysms treated with Pipeline embolization devices: computational simulation and verification with Doppler ultrasonography on phantom models.

Authors:  Anderson Chun On Tsang; Simon Sui Man Lai; Wai Choi Chung; Abraham Yik Sau Tang; Gilberto Ka Kit Leung; Alexander Kai Kei Poon; Alfred Cheuk Hang Yu; Kwok Wing Chow
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2015-01-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.