Literature DB >> 21299386

Patients' self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness before and after exposure to facial photographs.

Giulio Alessandri Bonetti1, Andrea Alberti, Claudio Sartini, Serena Incerti Parenti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether exposure to pretreatment photographs of themselves influenced patients' self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness and willingness to undergo treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 100 subjects of white ancestry aged 18 years or older (Study Group) and 100 sex- and age-matched controls (Control Group) were selected. Photographs of the frontal view of the face and the profile view of the face, both at rest and while smiling, were taken of each participant. Only Study Group subjects were given a printed copy of their own images to be examined at home between the initial observation (T0) and a set date an average of 30 days later (T1). Each of the 200 subjects in the study completed a questionnaire at T0 and T1 exploring happiness regarding their smiles and their facial profiles, as well as willingness to undergo treatment.
RESULTS: At T1 in the Study Group, 50% of subjects responded with a lower opinion of their facial profiles than at T0; 11% and 45% were willing to undergo more comprehensive procedures to change the appearance of their smiles and profiles, respectively. No statistically significant change was seen in questionnaire answers between T0 and T1 for the Control Group.
CONCLUSION: Laypeople generally are not aware of their facial profiles. Pretreatment photograph exposure can increase profile self-awareness, an important factor in reducing the discrepancy between orthodontists' and patients' visual emphasis on dentofacial esthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21299386      PMCID: PMC8923550          DOI: 10.2319/101510-606.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  28 in total

1.  Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.

Authors:  M Gabriela Orsini; Greg J Huang; H Asuman Kiyak; Douglas S Ramsay; Anne-Marie Bollen; Nina K Anderson; Donald B Giddon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Jonathan B Schlosser; C Brian Preston; Judith Lampasso
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists.

Authors:  Yoon S Park; Carla A Evans; Grace Viana; Nina K Anderson; Donald B Giddon
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2006

4.  A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.

Authors:  Jenny R Maple; Katherine W L Vig; F Michael Beck; Peter E Larsen; Shiva Shanker
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  The importance of the facial profile in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a patient report.

Authors:  Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Marinês Vieira da Silva Sousa; Paulo Eduardo Guedes Carvalho; Karyna Martins do Valle-Corotti
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2009

6.  Discrepancy between objective and subjective profile measures.

Authors:  D B Giddon; L E Hershon; B Lennartsson
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1974

7.  Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.

Authors:  Erdal Işiksal; Serpil Hazar; Sercan Akyalçin
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Facial profile preferences of black women before and after orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Javonne McKoy-White; Carla A Evans; Grace Viana; Nina K Anderson; Donald B Giddon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Comparison of Chinese and US orthodontists' averaged evaluations of "facial attractiveness" from end-of-treatment facial photographs.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Edward L Korn; Hee Soo Oh; Helmer Pearson; Tian-Min Xu; Sheldon Baumrind
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.

Authors:  Roxanne Shafiee; Edward L Korn; Helmer Pearson; Robert L Boyd; Sheldon Baumrind
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  5 in total

1.  Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance.

Authors:  J von Bremen; C Erbe; H Pancherz; S Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Smile dimensions affect self-perceived smile attractiveness.

Authors:  Simone Horn; Natalia Matuszewska; Nikolaos Gkantidis; Carlalberta Verna; Georgios Kanavakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effect of lower facial height and anteroposterior lip position on esthetic preference for Korean silhouette profiles.

Authors:  Kyung-Hyun Seo; Deuk-Hun So; Kyeong-Tae Song; Sung-Kwon Choi; Kyung-Hwa Kang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Differences in dentofacial characteristics of Class I malocclusion between Saudi and Japanese adult females.

Authors:  Mona A Abbassy; Amal Abushal
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

5.  Impact of a "TED-Style" presentation on potential patients' willingness to accept dental implant therapy: a one-group, pre-test post-test study.

Authors:  Henry Ghanem; Kelvin Ian Afrashtehfar; Samer Abi-Nader; Faleh Tamimi
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.904

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.