Literature DB >> 21278912

Reaction time, memory strength, and fMRI activity during memory retrieval: Hippocampus and default network are differentially responsive during recollection and familiarity judgments.

Sarah I Gimbel1, James B Brewer.   

Abstract

Retrieval is often subdivided into recollection and familiarity. Memory-strength and reaction time (RT) differ for each, complicating fMRI studies of these processes. Recollection leads to greater activity in the hippocampus and default network (DN). Increased DN activity with recollection is thought to reflect self-referential processes, but prior studies have not accounted for varying RT, which modulates DN activity and is consistently faster for recollection than familiarity. This study examined the influence of RT and memory-strength on recollection and familiarity activity. The results show the hippocampus functionally dissociated from DN during retrieval. DN was generally influenced by RT and signal was suppressed when subjects were task-engaged in recollection or familiarity; suppression was greater for slower trials of either type. The hippocampus showed a positive deflection of fMRI activity only for recollection trials; activation was greater for slower recollection trials, but RT did not influence hippocampal activity during familiarity trials.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21278912      PMCID: PMC3026441          DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2010.513770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 1758-8928            Impact factor:   3.065


  32 in total

1.  Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Heather J Rice; Anthony D Wagner; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  W B SCOVILLE; B MILNER
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1957-02       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention.

Authors:  D H Weissman; K C Roberts; K M Visscher; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-11       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network.

Authors:  Justin L Vincent; Abraham Z Snyder; Michael D Fox; Benjamin J Shannon; Jessica R Andrews; Marcus E Raichle; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Dissociating the roles of the default-mode, dorsal, and ventral networks in episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Analysis of RT distributions in the remember-know paradigm.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Min Zeng
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

8.  Failure to acquire new semantic knowledge in patients with large medial temporal lobe lesions.

Authors:  Peter J Bayley; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: evidence from positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Schacter; N M Alpert; C R Savage; S L Rauch; M S Albert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that.

Authors:  N J Cohen; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Imbalance of incidental encoding across tasks: an explanation for non-memory-related hippocampal activations?

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; James B Brewer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-06-17

2.  Recollection is fast and slow.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; K Nakamura; W-F A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Retrieval search and strength evoke dissociable brain activity during episodic memory recall.

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; James B Brewer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Search-Related Suppression of Hippocampus and Default Network Activity during Associative Memory Retrieval.

Authors:  Emilie T Reas; Sarah I Gimbel; Jena B Hales; James B Brewer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Differences in brain function and changes with intervention in children with poor spelling and reading abilities.

Authors:  Daniela Gebauer; Andreas Fink; Reinhard Kargl; Gernot Reishofer; Karl Koschutnig; Christian Purgstaller; Franz Fazekas; Christian Enzinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Elaboration versus suppression of cued memories: influence of memory recall instruction and success on parietal lobe, default network, and hippocampal activity.

Authors:  Sarah I Gimbel; James B Brewer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.