Literature DB >> 12215249

Clinical interpretation and recommendations for patients with a variant of uncertain significance in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a survey of genetic counseling practice.

Nancie Petrucelli1, Noam Lazebnik, Karen M Huelsman, Roee S Lazebnik.   

Abstract

The intent of this study was to document current practices in breast cancer genetic counseling and identify areas of variability for patients with a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. Registered members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Cancer Special Interest Group (SIG) were sent an invitation via electronic mail to participate in an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: clinical experience, clinical meaning, and risk perceptions and clinical recommendations for clinical situations involving a VUS. Fifty-seven of the eligible members responded. During the pre-test counseling session for a BRCA risk assessment patient, the vast majority of counselors (80.7%) mention VUS as a possible test result. Nearly half, 49.1%, report having given such a result to their patients at least one to four times. However, only 63.2% felt as though their patients understood the meaning of a VUS result. When asked to conclude the implication of a VUS and make medical management recommendations, the responses were varied. Nevertheless, a good proportion of counselors expressed the importance of testing other family members to help clarify the proband's risk and aid in medical management issues. Although the recent recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics suggest standards for the interpretation of sequence variations, they do not provide guidelines for making clinical recommendations based on these variations. The results of this study reveal significant diversity in the personal interpretation of a VUS result, leading to various clinical recommendations, and suggest a need for clinical management recommendations as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215249     DOI: 10.1089/10906570260199357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Test        ISSN: 1090-6576


  28 in total

1.  Autism-associated missense genetic variants impact locomotion and neurodevelopment in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Wan-Rong Wong; Katherine I Brugman; Shayda Maher; Jun Young Oh; Kevin Howe; Mihoko Kato; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  Clinician perspectives about molecular genetic testing for heritable conditions and development of a clinician-friendly laboratory report.

Authors:  Ira M Lubin; Margaret M McGovern; Zoe Gibson; Susan J Gross; Elaine Lyon; Roberta A Pagon; Victoria M Pratt; Jamila Rashid; Colleen Shaw; Lander Stoddard; Tracy L Trotter; Marc S Williams; Jean Amos Wilson; Kenneth Pass
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Genetic counselors' practices and confidence regarding variant of uncertain significance results and reclassification from BRCA testing.

Authors:  C L Scherr; N M Lindor; T L Malo; F J Couch; S T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 4.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing-pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance.

Authors:  D M Eccles; G Mitchell; A N A Monteiro; R Schmutzler; F J Couch; A B Spurdle; E B Gómez-García
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Clinical Variant Classification: A Comparison of Public Databases and a Commercial Testing Laboratory.

Authors:  William Gradishar; KariAnne Johnson; Krystal Brown; Erin Mundt; Susan Manley
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-04-13

Review 6.  Ethical considerations in genomic testing for hematologic disorders.

Authors:  Jonathan M Marron; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Precision reproductive medicine: multigene panel testing for infertility risk assessment.

Authors:  Stephen C Collins
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Ability of Patients to Distinguish Among Cardiac Genomic Variant Subclassifications.

Authors:  Lydia D Hellwig; Barbara B Biesecker; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Cynthia A James; William M P Klein
Journal:  Circ Genom Precis Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 9.  Family-Specific Variants and the Limits of Human Genetics.

Authors:  Brian H Shirts; Colin C Pritchard; Tom Walsh
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 11.951

10.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.