Literature DB >> 12208550

Asymmetric hemodynamic responses of the human auditory cortex to monaural and binaural stimulation.

L Jäncke1, T Wüstenberg, K Schulze, H J Heinze.   

Abstract

Applying whole-head functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 11 neurologically intact subjects, hemodynamic responses to mon- or binaurally presented auditory stimuli were measured. To expand on previous studies in this research area, we used tones and consonant-vowel (CV) syllables. In one group of subjects (n=6) the perceived loudness of the monaurally presented stimuli were adjusted so that they matched the loudness of the binaurally presented stimuli. In a second group (n=5) no loudness adjustment was performed, thus the monaural stimuli were perceived less loud ( approximately 10 dB) than the binaural stimuli. These extensions allowed us to test whether CV syllables and tones produce different contralaterality effects (stronger hemodynamic responses in the auditory cortex contralateral to the stimulated ear) and whether binaural stimulation results in stronger activations in the auditory areas than during both monaural stimulation conditions (binaural summation) independent of loudness influences. In summary, we obtained the following findings: (1) strong contralaterality effects during monaural acoustic stimulation in the posterior superior temporal gyrus (STG) comprising the planum temporale and the dorsal bank of the superior temporal sulcus to CV syllables and tones; (2) the hemodynamic responses to contralaterally presented stimuli (during the monaural conditions) were mostly stronger than those to binaurally presented CV syllables; (3) there was no interaction between stimulus type and the size of the contralaterality effect; (4) there was no indication of binaural summation, rather we found stronger hemodynamic responses to the sum of both monaural stimulations (right and left ear) than to binaural stimulation in all auditory areas; (5) there were generally stronger hemodynamic responses to CV syllables than to tones in the posterior STG, while the hemodynamic responses to tones were stronger in the anterior part of the STG (temporal pole); and finally (6) there was no general difference in terms of hemodynamic response in the auditory cortex between the two groups when receiving either loudness-matched or non-loudness-matched monaural stimulation. These findings are discussed in the context of the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms, the peculiarities of functional fMRI, and the direct access and callosal relay models of hemispheric lateralization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12208550     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00488-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  35 in total

1.  Functional asymmetry for auditory processing in human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joseph T Devlin; Josephine Raley; Elizabeth Tunbridge; Katherine Lanary; Anna Floyer-Lea; Charvy Narain; Ian Cohen; Timothy Behrens; Peter Jezzard; Paul M Matthews; David R Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural correlates of syntactic transformations.

Authors:  Isabell Wartenburger; Hauke R Heekeren; Frank Burchert; Steffi Heinemann; Ria De Bleser; Arno Villringer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Listening in silence activates auditory areas: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Julien Voisin; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Olivier Bertrand; Pierre Fonlupt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cross-cultural music phrase processing: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yun Nan; Thomas R Knösche; Stefan Zysset; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Auditory priming of frequency and temporal information: effects of lateralised presentation.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Timothy Justus
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2007-11

6.  Auditory processing disorders with and without central auditory discrimination deficits.

Authors:  Alexandra Annemarie Ludwig; Michael Fuchs; Eberhard Kruse; Brigitte Uhlig; Sonja Annette Kotz; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06

7.  Lateralization and Binaural Interaction of Middle-Latency and Late-Brainstem Components of the Auditory Evoked Response.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Daniel Burchard; Christian Starzynski; Helmut Riedel; Andre Rupp; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19

8.  Stimulus dependence of contralateral dominance in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Iris Steinmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Tuning to Binaural Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

10.  Cortical activation patterns to spatially presented pure tone stimuli with different intensities measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Günther Bauernfeind; Selina C Wriessnegger; Sabine Haumann; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.