Literature DB >> 12208544

PET imaging of the normal human auditory system: responses to speech in quiet and in background noise.

R J Salvi1, A H Lockwood, R D Frisina, M L Coad, D S Wack, D R Frisina.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms involved in listening to sentences, and then detecting and verbalizing a specific word are poorly understood, but most likely involve complex neural networks. We used positron emission tomography to identify the areas of the human brain that are activated when young, normal hearing males and females were asked to listen to a sentence and repeat the last word from the Speech in Noise (SPIN) test. Listening conditions were (1) Quiet, (2) Speech, (3) Noise, and (4) SPIN with stimuli presented monaurally to either the left ear or the right ear. The least difficult listening task, Speech, resulted in bilateral activation of superior and middle temporal gyrus and pre-central gyrus. The Noise and SPIN conditions activated many of the same regions as Speech alone plus additional sites within the cerebellum, thalamus and superior/middle frontal gyri. Comparison of the SPIN condition versus Speech revealed additional activation in the right anterior lobe of the cerebellum and right medial frontal gyrus, near the cingulate. None of the left ear-right ear stimulus comparison revealed any significant differences except for the SPIN condition that showed greater activation in the left superior temporal gyrus for stimuli presented to the right ear. No gender differences were observed. These results demonstrate that repeating the last word in a sentence activates mainly auditory and motor areas of the brain when Speech is presented, whereas more difficult tasks, such as SPIN or multi-talker Noise, activate linguistic, attentional, cognitive, working memory, and motor planning areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12208544     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00386-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  19 in total

1.  [Auditory processing disorders : Consensus statement by the German Society for Phoniatry and Paedaudiology].

Authors:  A Nickisch; M Gross; R Schönweiler; V Uttenweiler; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; R Berger; H J Radü; M Ptok
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Contribution of spiking activity in the primary auditory cortex to detection in noise.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Sharath Bennur; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural bases of categorization of simple speech and nonspeech sounds.

Authors:  Fatima T Husain; Stephen J Fromm; Randall H Pursley; Lara A Hosey; Allen R Braun; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  A perspective on brain-behavior relationships and effects of age and hearing using speech-in-noise stimuli.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Brandon M Madsen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Reproducibility of fMRI activations associated with auditory sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Thomas M Talavage
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Cortical activity patterns predict robust speech discrimination ability in noise.

Authors:  Jai A Shetake; Jordan T Wolf; Ryan J Cheung; Crystal T Engineer; Satyananda K Ram; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 8.  The neural processing of masked speech.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Functional imaging of the thalamus in language.

Authors:  Daniel A Llano
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Patrick C M Wong; James Xumin Jin; Geshri M Gunasekera; Rebekah Abel; Edward R Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.