Literature DB >> 10536125

Use of the selective oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir to prevent influenza.

F G Hayden1, R L Atmar, M Schilling, C Johnson, D Poretz, D Paar, L Huson, P Ward, R G Mills.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Safe and effective antiviral agents are needed to prevent infection with influenza A and B virus. Oseltamivir (GS4104), which can be administered orally, is the prodrug of GS4071, a potent and selective inhibitor of influenzavirus neuraminidases. We studied the use of oseltamivir for long-term prophylaxis against influenza in two placebo-controlled, double-blind trials at different U.S. sites during the winter of 1997-1998.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 1559 healthy, nonimmunized adults 18 to 65 years old to receive either oral oseltamivir (75 mg given once or twice daily, for a total daily dose of 75 or 150 mg) or placebo for six weeks during a peak period of local influenzavirus activity. The primary end point with respect to efficacy was laboratory-confirmed influenza-like illness (defined as a temperature of at least 37.2 degrees C accompanied by at least one respiratory and at least one systemic symptom).
RESULTS: In the two studies combined, the risk of influenza among subjects assigned to either once-daily or twice-daily oseltamivir (1.2 percent and 1.3 percent, respectively) was lower than that among subjects assigned to placebo (4.8 percent; P<0.001 and P=0.001 for the comparison with once-daily and twice-daily oseltamivir, respectively). The protective efficacy of oseltamivir in the two active-treatment groups combined was 74 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 53 to 88 percent) at all the sites combined and 82 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 60 to 93 percent) at sites in Virginia, where the rate of influenza infection was higher than the overall rate. For culture-proved influenza, the rate of protective efficacy in the two oseltamivir groups combined was 87 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 65 to 96 percent). The rate of laboratory-confirmed influenza infection was lower with oseltamivir than with placebo (5.3 percent vs. 10.6 percent, P<0.001). Oseltamivir was well tolerated but was associated with a greater frequency of nausea (12.1 percent and 14.6 percent in the once-daily and twice-daily groups, respectively) and vomiting (2.5 percent and 2.7 percent, respectively) than was placebo (nausea, 7.1 percent; vomiting, 0.8 percent). However, the frequency of premature discontinuation of drug or placebo was similar among the three groups (3.1 to 4.0 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Oseltamivir administered daily for six weeks by the oral route is safe and effective for the prevention of influenza.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10536125     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199910283411802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  122 in total

1.  Coping with flu season.

Authors:  E Weir
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  How to treat influenza and colds.

Authors:  M C Kim; N P Lee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-04

3.  Infections Associated with Health-care Personnel: Vaccine-preventable Diseases and Bloodborne Pathogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Randomized Trials of a Neuraminidase Inhibitor to Prevent Influenza.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Influenza: New Insights Into an Old Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 6.  Oseltamivir in seasonal, avian H5N1 and pandemic 2009 A/H1N1 influenza: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics.

Authors:  Nicolas Widmer; Pascal Meylan; Anton Ivanyuk; Manel Aouri; Laurent A Decosterd; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Oseltamivir: a review of its use in influenza.

Authors:  K McClellan; C M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Comparison of the Denka-Seiken INFLU A.B-Quick and BD Directigen Flu A+B kits with direct fluorescent-antibody staining and shell vial culture methods for rapid detection of influenza viruses.

Authors:  James J Dunn; Chris Gordon; Christy Kelley; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination: current situation and future prospects.

Authors:  F Horwood; J Macfarlane
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Comparison of anti-influenza virus activity and pharmacokinetics of oseltamivir free base and oseltamivir phosphate.

Authors:  Jin Soo Shin; Keun Bon Ku; Yejin Jang; Yi-Seul Yoon; Daeho Shin; Oh Seung Kwon; Yun Young Go; Seong Soon Kim; Myoung Ae Bae; Meehyein Kim
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.