Literature DB >> 12200478

Contribution of homoplasy and of ancestral polymorphism to the evolution of genes in anthropoid primates.

Colm O'hUigin1, Yoko Satta, Naoyuki Takahata, Jan Klein.   

Abstract

Molecular phylogenies of lineages that split from one another in short succession are often difficult to resolve because different loci and different sites within the same locus yield incongruent relationships. The incongruity is commonly attributed to two causes: differential assortment of ancestral polymorphisms and homoplasy. To assess the relative contribution of these two causes, sequences of 57 segments from 51 loci in six primate lineages (human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, macaque, and tamarin, abbreviated as H, C, G, O, M, and T, respectively) were subjected to "partitioning" analysis, in which phylogenetically informative sites were identified in all 15 pairwise comparisons of each of the 57 segments and tallied for their support or lack thereof for each of the theoretically possible phylogenies. The six lineages include one of the best known cases of a difficult-to-resolve phylogeny: the trichotomy (H, C, G), in which the three lineages may have diverged from each other within a short period of time. In this period many of the ancestral polymorphisms apparently persisted and yielded phylogenetically incongruent signals. By contrast, no ancestral polymorphism is expected to have survived during the interval separating the divergences of the O, M, and T lineages from the ancestor of the (H, C, G) group. Any phylogenetic incompatibilities at sites in the O, M, and T lineages relative to the (H, C, G) group are therefore presumably the result of homoplasy. The frequency of homoplasy estimated in this manner is unexpectedly high: 12% for the (H, C, G) clade and 19% for the (H, C, G, O) clade. At least three-quarters of the 48% incompatibility observed in the (H, C) clade is attributable to the sorting out of ancestral polymorphisms coupled with intragenic recombination. Possible reasons for this high level of homoplasy in the O, M, and T lineages are discussed, and a computer simulation has been carried out to produce a model explaining the observed data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12200478     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  16 in total

1.  Evolutionary relationships of major histocompatibility complex class I genes in simian primates.

Authors:  Hiromi Sawai; Yoshi Kawamoto; Naoyuki Takahata; Yoko Satta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The probability and chromosomal extent of trans-specific polymorphism.

Authors:  Carsten Wiuf; Keyan Zhao; Hideki Innan; Magnus Nordborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Nuclear markers confirm taxonomic status and relationships among highly endangered and closely related right whale species.

Authors:  C A Gaines; M P Hare; S E Beck; H C Rosenbaum
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Great ape genomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

5.  Lineage-specific duplication and loss of pepsinogen genes in hominoid evolution.

Authors:  Yuichi Narita; Sen-ichi Oda; Osamu Takenaka; Takashi Kageyama
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  RNase T2 genes from rice and the evolution of secretory ribonucleases in plants.

Authors:  Gustavo C MacIntosh; Melissa S Hillwig; Alexander Meyer; Lex Flagel
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 7.  Paleopopulation genetics.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Divergence, demography and gene loss along the human lineage.

Authors:  Hie Lim Kim; Takeshi Igawa; Ayaka Kawashima; Yoko Satta; Naoyuki Takahata
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Alu elements and hominid phylogenetics.

Authors:  Abdel-Halim Salem; David A Ray; Jinchuan Xing; Pauline A Callinan; Jeremy S Myers; Dale J Hedges; Randall K Garber; David J Witherspoon; Lynn B Jorde; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Fine-scale phylogenetic discordance across the house mouse genome.

Authors:  Michael A White; Cécile Ané; Colin N Dewey; Bret R Larget; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.