Literature DB >> 17180324

Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings.

Stefania Tamburrini1, Arturo Brunetti, Michèle Brown, Claude Sirlin, Giovanna Casola.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine the (1) frequency with which nonenhanced computed tomography (CT) (NECT) permits conclusive diagnosis of acute appendicitis, (2) accuracy of NECT when findings are conclusive, and (3) overall accuracy of a CT protocol consisting of NECT with selective use of contrast. Five hundred and thirty-six patients underwent a NECT protocol with selective use of contrast. Diagnostic accuracy was then determined separately for (1) patients with conclusive initial NECT, (2) patients with inconclusive initial NECT, and (3) all patients. NECT was conclusive on initial interpretation in 404/536 patients and inconclusive in 132/536. Of 132 inconclusive studies, 126 were repeated with contrast (intravenous, oral or rectal). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value for diagnosis of acute appendicitis were (1) 90%, 96.0%, 84.8%, and 97.4% in patients with conclusive NECT (n = 404); (2) 95.6%, 92.3%, 73%, and 99% in patients with inconclusive NECT followed by repeat CT with contrast; and (3) 91.3%, 95%, 82%, and 98% in all patients. The initial diagnosis of appendicitis may be made by NECT in 75% of patients, with contrast administration reserved for inconclusive NECT studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17180324     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0527-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  32 in total

1.  Is unenhanced CT sufficient for evaluation of acute abdominal pain?

Authors:  Sandip Basak; Levon N Nazarian; Richard J Wechsler; Laurence Parker; Brian D Williams; Anna S Lev-Toaff; Alfred B Kurtz
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Unenhanced helical CT for evaluating acute abdominal pain: a little more cost, a lot more information.

Authors:  R E Mindelzun; R B Jeffrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  CT of appendicitis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; R B Gordon
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 1.875

4.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Distal appendicitis: CT appearance and diagnosis.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  P M Rao; J T Rhea; R A Novelline; A A Mostafavi; J N Lawrason; C J McCabe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Diagnostic value of unenhanced helical CT in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  G Ege; H Akman; A Sahin; D Bugra; K Kuzucu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Jose M Pereira; Claude B Sirlin; Pedro S Pinto; R Brooke Jeffrey; Damien L Stella; Giovanna Casola
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Computed tomography of the abnormal appendix.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; A J Megibow; R B Gordon; C A Whelan; D Hulnick
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Effect of contrast-enhanced computed tomography on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in adults.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Shuji Yamada; Jun Aoki; Teiji Motojima; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Difficulties in the diagnosis of appendicitis: review of CT and US images.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kosaka; Tadashi Sagoh; Hidemasa Uematsu; Hirohiko Kimura; Sanae Yamamori; Shiro Miyayama; Harumi Itoh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2007-08-03

2.  The impact of introducing a no oral contrast abdominopelvic CT examination (NOCAPE) pathway on radiology turn around times, emergency department length of stay, and patient safety.

Authors:  Seyed Amirhossein Razavi; Jamlik-Omari Johnson; Michael T Kassin; Kimberly E Applegate
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-06-06

3.  Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Alexandra Platon; Helmi Jlassi; Olivier T Rutschmann; Christoph D Becker; Francis R Verdun; Pascal Gervaz; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults.

Authors:  Bo Rud; Thomas S Vejborg; Eli D Rappeport; Johannes B Reitsma; Peer Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-19

Review 5.  A pictorial essay of the most atypical variants of the vermiform appendix position in computed tomography with their possible clinical implications.

Authors:  Anna Zacharzewska-Gondek; Agata Szczurowska; Maciej Guziński; Marek Sąsiadek; Joanna Bladowska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-04

6.  Does limiting oral contrast decrease emergency department length of stay?

Authors:  Christy L Hopkins; Troy Madsen; Zachary Foy; Michielle Reina; Erik Barton
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.