Literature DB >> 12196034

Need for care and perceptions of MIDAS among headache sufferers study.

Walter Stewart1, Richard Lipton.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with migraine have varying medical care needs. To effectively stratify patients to appropriate care, physicians should consider the frequency and intensity of attacks, and their overall impact on ability to function. The Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) measures headache-related disability. The MIDAS Perceptions Study investigated whether MIDAS scores reflect headache severity and the need for medical care, and assessed whether the MIDAS questionnaire is meaningful and relevant to patients, and easy to use.
DESIGN: The Perceptions Study was conducted as a follow-up to a baseline telephone interview. Upon completion of the baseline survey, 471 individuals were invited to participate in the Perceptions Study and 420 participated: 168 patients with migraine headaches and 253 with non-migraine headaches. Patients with migraine or non-migraine headaches completed the MIDAS questionnaire and the Center of Epidemiologic Studies of Depression (CES-D) questionnaire, and were then interviewed by telephone within 48 hours of receiving the questionnaires.
RESULTS: Headache frequency and pain intensity increased significantly with increasing MIDAS grade (p < 0.0001). A pattern of decreasing quality-of-life scores on the physical and mental subscales of the Short Form-12 was also seen with increasing MIDAS grade. Scores on the CES-D scale increased significantly with increasing MIDAS grade (p < 0.0001), indicating a greater likelihood of depression and more severe depression with higher grades. There were significant associations between increasing MIDAS grade and an increasing proportion of individuals who had consulted a doctor within the past year, lower use of over-the-counter medication, and greater use of prescription medications (p < 0.0001 for all three variables). Satisfaction with current therapy decreased significantly with increasing MIDAS grade, mirroring the frequency with which individuals achieved complete relief from headache. The MIDAS questionnaire was rated as easy to use by the vast majority of respondents, and ratings of its perceived value increased significantly as MIDAS grade increased.
CONCLUSIONS: A low MIDAS score generally seems to indicate a low need for care, while individuals in MIDAS grades III and IV appear to have significant unmet medical care needs. The MIDAS questionnaire had increasingly perceived relevance as MIDAS grade increased, helped the majority of those in MIDAS grades III and IV to understand the impact of their headaches, and encouraged those with the greatest disability to seek medical care. The MIDAS questionnaire may facilitate communication between doctors and patients, and help physicians to identify those receiving inadequate medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12196034     DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200216001-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Drugs        ISSN: 1172-7047            Impact factor:   5.749


  18 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Prevalence of migraine headache in the United States. Relation to age, income, race, and other sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; D D Celentano; M L Reed
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; K Kolodner; J Liberman; J Sawyer
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.292

4.  An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; J Whyte; A Dowson; K Kolodner; J N Liberman; J Sawyer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-09-22       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability.

Authors:  W F Stewart; R B Lipton; A J Dowson; J Sawyer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Stratified care vs step care strategies for migraine: the Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study: A randomized trial.

Authors:  R B Lipton; W F Stewart; A M Stone; M J Láinez; J P Sawyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Epidemiology of headache.

Authors:  B K Rasmussen
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.292

8.  A nationwide survey of migraine in France: prevalence and clinical features in adults. GRIM.

Authors:  P Henry; P Michel; B Brochet; J F Dartigues; S Tison; R Salamon
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  Prevalence of adult migraine in general practice.

Authors:  J Winnem
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 10.  Migraine in the United States: a review of epidemiology and health care use.

Authors:  R B Lipton; W F Stewart
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Psychological risk factors in headache.

Authors:  Robert A Nicholson; Timothy T Houle; Jamie L Rhudy; Peter J Norton
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.887

2.  In-office discussions of migraine: results from the American Migraine Communication Study.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Steven R Hahn; Roger K Cady; Jan Lewis Brandes; Suzanne E Simons; Philip A Bain; Meaghan R Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Migraines and meditation: does spirituality matter?

Authors:  Amy B Wachholtz; Kenneth I Pargament
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2008-06-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.