Literature DB >> 11294956

Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability.

W F Stewart1, R B Lipton, A J Dowson, J Sawyer.   

Abstract

The MIDAS Questionnaire was developed to assess headache-related disability with the aim of improving migraine care. Headache sufferers answer five questions, scoring the number of days, in the past 3 months, of activity limitations due to migraine. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity (accuracy) of the questionnaire were assessed in separate population-based studies of migraine sufferers. In addition, the face validity, ease of use, and clinical utility of the questionnaire were evaluated in a group of 49 physicians who independently rated disease severity and need for care in a diverse sample of migraine case histories. The test-retest Pearson correlation coefficient for the total MIDAS score was approximately 0.8. The MIDAS score was valid when compared with a reference diary-based measure of disability; the overall correlation between MIDAS and the diary-based measure was 0.63. The MIDAS score was also correlated with physicians' assessments of need for medical care (r = 0.69). From studies completed to date, the MIDAS Questionnaire has been shown to be internally consistent, highly reliable, valid, and correlates with physicians' clinical judgment. These features support its suitability for use in clinical practice. Use of the MIDAS Questionnaire may improve physician-patient communication about headache-related disability and may favorably influence health-care delivery for migraine patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11294956     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_1.s20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  244 in total

1.  Cost of healthcare for patients with migraine in five European countries: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS).

Authors:  L M Bloudek; M Stokes; D C Buse; T K Wilcox; R B Lipton; P J Goadsby; S F Varon; A M Blumenfeld; Z Katsarava; J Pascual; M Lanteri-Minet; P Cortelli; P Martelletti
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 7.277

2.  Choroidal thickness measurements in migraine patients during attack-free period.

Authors:  Emine Esra Karaca; Emine Belgin Koçer; Şengül Özdek; Hanife Tuba Akçam; Merve Bahar Ercan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Lifetime prevalence and correlates of migraine among women in a pacific northwest pregnancy cohort study.

Authors:  Ihunnaya O Frederick; Chunfang Qiu; Daniel A Enquobahrie; Sheena K Aurora; B Lee Peterlin; Bizu Gelaye; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.887

4.  The contribution of pain-related anxiety to disability from headache.

Authors:  Justin M Nash; David M Williams; Robert Nicholson; Peter C Trask
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2006-01-06

Review 5.  Burden of tension-type headache.

Authors:  Marc E Lenaerts
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2006-12

6.  Influences on headache trigger beliefs and perceptions.

Authors:  Dana P Turner; Timothy T Houle
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 6.292

Review 7.  Acupuncture for the prevention of episodic migraine.

Authors:  Klaus Linde; Gianni Allais; Benno Brinkhaus; Yutong Fei; Michael Mehring; Emily A Vertosick; Andrew Vickers; Adrian R White
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-28

8.  Can Circadian Dysregulation Exacerbate Migraines?

Authors:  Jason C Ong; Hannah L Taylor; Margaret Park; Helen J Burgess; Rina S Fox; Sarah Snyder; Jeanetta C Rains; Colin A Espie; James K Wyatt
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.887

9.  Smartphone based behavioral therapy for pain in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients: A feasibility acceptability randomized controlled study for the treatment of comorbid migraine and ms pain.

Authors:  Mia T Minen; Kathryn B Schaubhut; Kaitlyn Morio
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.339

10.  The responsiveness of headache impact scales scored using 'classical' and 'modern' psychometric methods: a re-analysis of three clinical trials.

Authors:  M Kosinski; J B Bjorner; J E Ware; A Batenhorst; R K Cady
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.