Literature DB >> 12195973

Effects of noise on transient-evoked oto-acoustic emission pass/fail criteria.

L P Yang1, S T Young, T S Kuo.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of noise on typical transient-evoked oto-acoustic emission (TEOAE) pass/fail criteria. Different levels of synthesised noise were added to one TEOAE signal, to determine the relationship between the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and typical TEOAE parameters: reproducibility, TEOAE level and corrected TEOAE level. Results showed that, with the same TEOAE signal, if the SNR decreased from 19 dB to -7 dB, the means of estimated reproducibility decreased from 97% to 7%, and the means of estimated TEOAE levels were doubled. Only the means of estimated corrected TEOAE levels were relatively insensitive to SNR. The standard deviations of all TEOAE parameter estimators increased with decreasing SNR. With these results, this study proposed that each typical TEOAE parameter alone should not be taken as the absolute pass/fail criterion. A combination of the corrected TEOAE level and the reproducibility would be better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12195973     DOI: 10.1007/bf02344208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  11 in total

1.  Modification of the wavelet method used in transiently evoked otoacoustic emission pass/fail criterion to increase its accuracy.

Authors:  L P Yang; S T Young; T S Ku
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss.

Authors:  D M Hussain; M P Gorga; S T Neely; D H Keefe; J Peters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  K Rhoades; B McPherson; V Smyth; J Kei; A Baglioni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Noise and signal power and their effects on evoked potential estimation.

Authors:  B I Turetsky; J Raz; G Fein
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

5.  Confidence intervals for the signal-to-noise ratio when a signal embedded in noise is observed over repeated trials.

Authors:  J Raz; B Turetsky; G Fein
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria.

Authors:  K Welzl-Müller; K Stephan
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

7.  The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  J T Jacobson; C A Jacobson
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  C Elberling; M Don
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1984

9.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system.

Authors:  D T Kemp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  B A Prieve; M P Gorga; A Schmidt; S Neely; J Peters; L Schultes; W Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.