Literature DB >> 9867293

Effects of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

K Rhoades1, B McPherson, V Smyth, J Kei, A Baglioni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of increased levels of background noise on click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) recordings and to compare the effectiveness of the default CEOAE program with the QuickScreen CEOAE program in increased levels of noise, using an Otodynamics ILO88 recording device.
DESIGN: The right ears of 40 young adult women with normal hearing were assessed using CEOAEs under four different noise conditions and with two different methods of data collection. The noise conditions were in quiet, 50 dB A, 55 dB A, and 60 dB A of white noise. Data were collected at each noise level in the default mode and also using the ILO88 QuickScreen program.
RESULTS: There was a significant change in a number of important CEOAE output parameters with increased noise. In the default mode, mean whole wave reproducibility was 89.2% in quiet but declined to 85% with 50 dB A of white noise, 65% at 55 dB A and 20% at 60 dB A. The QuickScreen program proved more robust to the effects of noise than the default. In that mode, mean whole wave reproducibility was 91.7% in quiet, 92.5% with 50 dB A of white noise, 82.5% at 55 dB A and 45% at 60 dB A.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study indicate ambient noise levels for accurate CEOAE recording should not exceed 50 to 55 dB A of noise and alternatives to the default program should be considered in non-sound-treated situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9867293     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199812000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  6 in total

1.  Modification of the wavelet method used in transiently evoked otoacoustic emission pass/fail criterion to increase its accuracy.

Authors:  L P Yang; S T Young; T S Ku
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effects of background noise on recording of portable transient-evoked otoacoustic emission in newborn hearing screening.

Authors:  Husain Salina; Asma Abdullah; Siti Zamratol Mai-sarah Mukari; Mohd Tamil Azmi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Status of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in the State of Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Madhan Chandrasekar; Heramba Ganapathy Selvarajan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-26

4.  Effects of noise on transient-evoked oto-acoustic emission pass/fail criteria.

Authors:  L P Yang; S T Young; T S Kuo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates: normative data.

Authors:  Vicky Wei Zhang; Bradley McPherson; Zhi-Guo Zhang
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2008-04-17

6.  Evaluation of universal newborn hearing screening in South African primary care.

Authors:  Katijah Khoza-Shangase; Shannon Harbinson
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2015-05-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.