Literature DB >> 12194290

Non-targeted effects of radiation: bystander responses in cell and tissue models.

K M Prise1, O V Belyakov, H C Newman, S Patel, G Schettino, M Folkard, B D Michael.   

Abstract

The standard paradigm for radiation effects in cellular systems has involved direct damage to DNA and in particular, DNA double strand breaks as the triggering lesions leading to mutation, cell death and transformation. Recently, however, a growing body of evidence has reported non-targeted effects, which are not a direct consequence of the initial lesions produced in cellular DNA. These have included bystander responses, genomic instability, gene induction, adaptive responses and low dose hypersensitivity. A common observation of these responses is that they dominate at low doses and saturate with increasing dose. Non-targeted effects may therefore have consequences for extrapolation of risk estimates to low doses if these are important in vivo. A range of experimental techniques is being used to study non-targeted responses, including microbeam approaches. Microbeams have considerable advantages in that they allow individual cells and subcellular targets to be selected within populations with precise low doses and, if required, exact dose rates. Recent advances also allow targeting of 3-D cell systems. The mechanisms underlying non-targeted responses appear to involve production of reactive oxygen species and direct cell-to-cell signalling via gap junctional intercellular communication although significant differences exist in different cell types. The triggering lesions for these responses remain unclear however. Some non-targeted responses may be inter-related, for example in the case of bystander responses and instability and may be part of a general stress response system in irradiated populations. Some non-targeted effects may also act as protective mechanisms; if they lead to the removal of potentially damaged cells from the population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12194290     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  13 in total

1.  Radiation-induced bystander effects: evidence for an adaptive response to low dose exposures?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

Review 3.  Radiation-Induced Bystander Response: Mechanism and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Keiji Suzuki; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Biological effects of static magnetic field exposure in the context of MR-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Kim Mohajer; Andrew Nisbet; Eirini Velliou; Mazhar Ajaz; Giuseppe Schettino
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  [Plantar fasciitis and radiotherapy. Clinical and radiobiological treatment results].

Authors:  O Micke; M H Seeegenschmiedt; R Mücke; A de Vries; U Schäfer; N Willich
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Radiation-induced bystander signaling pathways in human fibroblasts: a role for interleukin-33 in the signal transmission.

Authors:  Vladimir N Ivanov; Hongning Zhou; Shanaz A Ghandhi; Thomas B Karasic; Benjamin Yaghoubian; Sally A Amundson; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 7.  Ligand liposomes and boron neutron capture therapy.

Authors:  Jörgen Carlsson; Erika Bohl Kullberg; Jacek Capala; Stefan Sjöberg; Katarina Edwards; Lars Gedda
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Comparison in vivo Study of Genotoxic Action of High- Versus Very Low Dose-Rate gamma-Irradiation.

Authors:  A N Osipov; D Y Klokov; A L Elakov; O M Rozanova; S I Zaichkina; G F Aptikaeva; A Kh Akhmadieva
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

9.  Low-dose radiation and genotoxic chemicals can protect against stochastic biological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Vernon E Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

10.  The impact of the bystander effect on the low-dose hypersensitivity phenomenon.

Authors:  Otilia Nuta; Firouz Darroudi
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.925

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.