Literature DB >> 12193444

Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities.

S A McKenzie1, E Chan, I Dundas, P D Bridge, C S Pao, M Mylonopoulou, M J R Healy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The measurement of airway resistance using the interrupter technique (R(int)) is feasible in preschool children and other subjects unable to undertake spirometry. This makes it potentially useful for the measurement of lung function in these groups. Commercial devices use different algorithms to measure pressure and flow from which R(int) is derived. This study provides normative values for British children using devices from a single manufacturer.
METHODS: R(int) was measured in 236 healthy children of three ethnic groups (Afro-Caribbean and black African, Bangladeshi, and white British) aged 2-10 years using Micro Medical devices. Software in the devices calculated R(int) from pressure measured by the two point, back extrapolation method from the pressure transient during valve closure, with flow measured just before valve closure.
RESULTS: R(int) is related to both age and height, but when age is allowed for there is not a significant relation with height. Neither gender nor any of the ethnicities studied was significantly related to R(int). DISCUSSION: These measurements in healthy children using this technique may be used as reference data for similar populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12193444      PMCID: PMC1719236          DOI: 10.1136/adc.87.3.248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  26 in total

Review 1.  Compilation of reference values for lung function measurements in children.

Authors:  P H Quanjer; J Stocks; G Polgar; M Wise; J Karlberg; G Borsboom
Journal:  Eur Respir J Suppl       Date:  1989-03

2.  The disciplining of medical data.

Authors:  M J Healy
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990.

Authors:  J V Freeman; T J Cole; S Chinn; P R Jones; E M White; M A Preece
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Evaluation of the interrupter technique for the use of assessing airway obstruction in children.

Authors:  E R Carter; A A Stecenko; B H Pollock; M J Jaeger
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1994-04

5.  Respiratory resistance measured by flow-interruption in a normal population.

Authors:  R van Altena; F Gimeno
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.580

6.  Upstream and total airway conductance in children and adolescents.

Authors:  A Zapletal; M Samanek; T Paul
Journal:  Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb

7.  The "opening" interruptor. A new variant of a technique for measuring respiratory resistance.

Authors:  K van der Plas; P Vooren
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis       Date:  1982-09

8.  Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children.

Authors:  E Lombardi; P D Sly; G Concutelli; E Novembre; G Veneruso; G Frongia; R Bernardini; A Vierucci
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Lung function measurement in awake young children.

Authors:  H Bisgaard; B Klug
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  A flow interruption device for measurement of airway resistance.

Authors:  P J Chowienczyk; C P Lawson; S Lane; R Johnson; N Wilson; M Silverman; G M Cochrane
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  9 in total

1.  Pulse Oximeter Plethysmograph Estimate of Pulsus Paradoxus as a Measure of Acute Asthma Exacerbation Severity and Response to Treatment.

Authors:  Donald H Arnold; Li Wang; Tina V Hartert
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  Noninvasive testing of lung function and inflammation in pediatric patients with acute asthma exacerbations.

Authors:  Donald H Arnold; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Thomas J Abramo; Tina V Hartert
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.515

3.  Repeatability of airway resistance measurements made using the interrupter technique.

Authors:  E Y Chan; P D Bridge; I Dundas; C S Pao; M J R Healy; S A McKenzie
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  The interrupter technique: feasibility in children in acute asthma.

Authors:  Simona Alexandra Tatar; Sorin Claudiu Man
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2010-01

5.  The Acute Asthma Severity Assessment Protocol (AASAP) study: objectives and methods of a study to develop an acute asthma clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  Donald H Arnold; Tebeb Gebretsadik; Thomas J Abramo; James R Sheller; Donald J Resha; Tina V Hartert
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Noninvasive assessment of asthma severity using pulse oximeter plethysmograph estimate of pulsus paradoxus physiology.

Authors:  Donald H Arnold; Cathy A Jenkins; Tina V Hartert
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.317

Review 7.  Usefulness of monitoring lung function in asthma.

Authors:  P L P Brand; R J Roorda
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Reference values for resistance and compliance based on the single occlusion technique in healthy infants from Southeast China.

Authors:  Jianfeng Huang; Hao Zhang; Mingzhi Zhang; Xiaobo Zhang; Libo Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  A population-based nested case control study on recurrent pneumonias in children with severe generalized cerebral palsy: ethical considerations of the design and representativeness of the study sample.

Authors:  Rebekka Veugelers; Elsbeth A C Calis; Corine Penning; Arianne Verhagen; Roos Bernsen; Jan Bouquet; Marc A Benninga; Peter J F M Merkus; Hubertus G M Arets; Dick Tibboel; Heleen M Evenhuis
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 2.125

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.