Literature DB >> 12190249

Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals.

Geoffrey R Patching1, Philip T Quinlan.   

Abstract

The role of attention in speeded Garner classification of concurrently presented auditory and visual signals was examined in 4 experiments. Within-trial interference (i.e., congruence effects) occurred regardless of the attentional demands of the task. Between-trials interference (i.e., Garner interference) occurred only under conditions of divided attention when making judgments about auditory signals. Of importance, the data show congruence effects in the absence of Garner interference. Such a pattern has been rarely reported in studies of the classification of purely visual stimuli and contradicts theoretical accounts asserting that the effects share a common locus. The data question the notion that Garner classification reveals fundamental insights about the nature of the perceptual processing of bimodal stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12190249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  12 in total

1.  Presentation format effects in working memory: the role of attention.

Authors:  Paul W Foos; Paula Goolkasian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

2.  Changes in auditory frequency guide visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Julia A Mossbridge; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-07-08

Review 3.  Why we are not all synesthetes (not even weakly so).

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

4.  Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features.

Authors:  Karla K Evans; Anne Treisman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Pitch-elevation and pitch-size cross-modal correspondences do not affect temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Kyuto Uno; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Synesthesia strengthens sound-symbolic cross-modal correspondences.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Margaret Martinez; Kelly McCormick; K Sathian
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Multisensory perception in Argus II retinal prosthesis patients: Leveraging auditory-visual mappings to enhance prosthesis outcomes.

Authors:  Noelle R B Stiles; Vivek R Patel; James D Weiland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Brain deactivation in the outperformance in bimodal tasks: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Tzu-Ching Chiang; Keng-Chen Liang; Jyh-Horng Chen; Chao-Hsien Hsieh; Yun-An Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Crossmodal interactions during affective picture processing.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Serena Mastria; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Audiovisual correspondence between musical timbre and visual shapes.

Authors:  Mohammad Adeli; Jean Rouat; Stéphane Molotchnikoff
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.