Literature DB >> 12187959

Immunohistochemical markers for prognosis of ependymal neoplasms.

Andrey Korshunov1, Andrey Golanov, Valery Timirgaz.   

Abstract

Intracranial ependymomas are the third most common primary brain tumor in children. Although clinical and histological criteria for ependymoma prognosis are recognized, studies have reported contradictory results. Prognostic significance based on immunohistochemistry of ependymomas has been reported in a few studies. One-hundred and twelve patients with intracranial ependymomas were examined retrospectively for immunoexpression of various tumor-associated antigens and apoptosis. The results demonstrated significant preponderance of expression of the tenascin, vascular endothelial growth factor protein (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGFR) and p53 protein in high-grade tumors. Also high-grade ependymomas revealed more prominent labeling indices (LI) for proliferative marker Ki-S1 and apoptotic index (AI), and lower LI for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27/Kipl and pl4ARF. For low-grade ependymomas the progression-free survival time (PFS) was found to be significantly shorter for Ki-S1 LI > 5%, and for tenascin, VEGF and EGFR positivity. For high-grade ependymomas PFS was found to be significantly reduced for p27 LI < 20%, p14ARF LI < 10%, for p53 positivity, and for AI < 1%. The CART modeling process exhibited five final groups of ependymoma patients (1) low-grade and tenascin-negative; (2) low-grade and tenascin-positive; (3) high-grade and p53-negative with p14 LI > 0%; (4) high-grade with combination of either p53 positivity and p14 LI > 10% or p53 negativity and p14 LI < 10%; (5) high-grade and p53-positive with pl4 LI < 10%. In summary, some immunohistochemical variables were found to be the strong predictors of ependymoma recurrence and they seem to be useful for assessing individual tumor prognosis in routinely processed biopsy specimens together with tumor grade. For histologically benign ependymomas immunohistochemical study should be focused on Ki-S1, tenascin, EGFR and VEGF evaluation, whereas p53 expression and number of p27, p14 and ISEL-positive nuclei will be of value in determining PFS from high-grade ependymomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12187959     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016222202230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  127 in total

1.  Ependymoma: a follow-up study of 101 cases.

Authors:  S J Mork; A C Loken
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Tenascin distribution in human brain tumours.

Authors:  P Castellani; A Dorcaratto; A Siri; L Zardi; G L Viale
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Ependymomas: a clinicopathologic study.

Authors:  C E Rawlings; F Giangaspero; P C Burger; D E Bullard
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1988-04

4.  CD99 immunoreactivity in ependymoma.

Authors:  Y L Choi; J G Chi; Y L Suh
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2001-06

5.  Molecular genetic analysis of non-astrocytic gliomas.

Authors:  C Y Tong; H K Ng; J C Pang; A B Hui; H C Ko; J C Lee
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Antineuronal nuclei immunohistochemical staining patterns in childhood ependymomas.

Authors:  J R Parker; D L Armstrong; D Strother; D M Rudman; R C Dauser; J P Laurent; J Deyd; P E Rouah
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.987

7.  Ependymoma: internal correlations among pathological signs: the anaplastic variant.

Authors:  D Schiffer; A Chiò; H Cravioto; M T Giordana; A Migheli; R Soffietti; M C Vigliani
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  p27/kip1 expression in human astrocytic gliomas.

Authors:  R Piva; P Cavalla; S Bortolotto; S Cordera; P Richiardi; D Schiffer
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-10-03       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Supratentorial lobar ependymomas: reports on the grading and survival periods in 80 cases, including 46 recurrences.

Authors:  D Afra; W Müller; F Slowik; O Wilcke; H Budka; L Turoczy
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 10.  Prognosis of ependymoma.

Authors:  D Schiffer; M T Giordana
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.475

View more
  26 in total

1.  The role of resection alone in select children with intracranial ependymoma: the Canadian Pediatric Brain Tumour Consortium experience.

Authors:  Tamir Ailon; Christopher Dunham; Anne-Sophie Carret; Uri Tabori; P Daniel Mcneely; Shayna Zelcer; Beverley Wilson; Lucie Lafay-Cousin; Donna Johnston; David D Eisenstat; Marianna Silva; Nada Jabado; Karen Jane Goddard; Chris Fryer; Glenda Hendson; Cynthia Hawkins; Sandra Dunn; Stephen Yip; Ashutosh Singhal; Juliette Hukin
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Immunohistochemical prognostic markers in intracranial ependymomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Klara Kuncova; Ales Janda; Pavel Kasal; Josef Zamecnik
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Study of chromosome 9q gain, Notch pathway regulators and Tenascin-C in ependymomas.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Mehar C Sharma; Vaishali Suri; Aanchal Kakkar; Manmohan Singh; Chitra Sarkar
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Prognostic marker analysis in pediatric intracranial ependymomas.

Authors:  Roger E McLendon; Eric Lipp; Diane Satterfield; Melissa Ehinger; Alan Austin; Debra Fleming; Kathryn Perkinson; Michaela Lefaivre; David Zagzag; Benjamin Wiener; Sri Gururangan; Herbert Fuchs; Henry S Friedman; James E Herndon; Patrick Healy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and caveolin-1 coexpression identifies adult supratentorial ependymomas with rapid unfavorable outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca Senetta; Clelia Miracco; Salvatore Lanzafame; Luigi Chiusa; Rosario Caltabiano; Antonio Galia; Giulia Stella; Paola Cassoni
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Sequential analysis of cadherin expression in a 4-year-old girl with intracranial ependymoma.

Authors:  Kentaro Yokoi; Masaharu Akiyama; Takaaki Yanagisawa; Junko Takahashi-Fujigasaki; Yuichi Yokokawa; Yoko Mikami-Terao; Kohei Fukuoka; Kohji Fujisawa; Hiromichi Nakazaki; Shizuo Oi; Yoshikatsu Eto; Hisashi Yamada
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Immunohistochemical study of CD99 and EMA expression in ependymomas.

Authors:  Soheir Mahfouz; Ahmad Abdel Aziz; Samia M Gabal; Samar el-Sheikh
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-02-19

Review 8.  Ependymoma in children: molecular considerations and therapeutic insights.

Authors:  J-H Kim; Y Huang; A S Griffin; P Rajappa; J P Greenfield
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 9.  Biological background of pediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma: a review from a translational research perspective.

Authors:  Judith M de Bont; Roger J Packer; Erna M Michiels; Monique L den Boer; Rob Pieters
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 10.  Classification and controversies in pathology of ependymomas.

Authors:  Catherine Godfraind
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.