Literature DB >> 24178439

Study of chromosome 9q gain, Notch pathway regulators and Tenascin-C in ependymomas.

Rakesh Kumar Gupta1, Mehar C Sharma, Vaishali Suri, Aanchal Kakkar, Manmohan Singh, Chitra Sarkar.   

Abstract

Ependymomas are relatively uncommon tumours of the central nervous system which arise from the ependymal lining of the ventricles and spinal canal. The molecular changes leading to ependymal oncogenesis are not completely understood. We examined chromosome 9q33-34 locus for gain, potential oncogenes at this locus (Notch-1 and Tenascin-C) and Notch pathway target genes (Hes-1, Hey-2 & C-myc) in ependymomas by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively, to assess if they have any correlation with clinical characteristics. We analyzed 50 cases of ependymomas by FISH for 9q gain and by IHC for Notch-1 and its target gene proteins (Hes-1, Hey-2 and C-myc) expression. We also performed IHC for Tenascin-C to rule out any correlation with aggressiveness/grade of tumour. FISH study revealed significant chromosome 9q gain in ependymomas of adult onset (age > 18 years) and spinal cord origin. Notch-1 showed significantly more frequent immunohistochemical expression in supratentorial and anaplastic ependymomas. Tenascin-C (TN-C) expression was significant in intracranial, childhood (age ≤ 18 years) and anaplastic ependymomas. Of the three Notch pathway target gene proteins (Hes-1, Hey-2 and C-myc), Hes-1 and C-myc expression showed significant correlation with anaplastic and adult onset ependymomas, respectively. Genetic alterations are independent prognostic markers in ependymomas. A clinicopathological correlation with various molecular signatures may be helpful in the development of new therapeutic targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24178439     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1287-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  38 in total

1.  Identification of tumor-specific molecular signatures in intracranial ependymoma and association with clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Piergiorgio Modena; Elena Lualdi; Federica Facchinetti; Joris Veltman; James F Reid; Simone Minardi; Irene Janssen; Felice Giangaspero; Marco Forni; Gaetano Finocchiaro; Lorenzo Genitori; Flavio Giordano; Riccardo Riccardi; Eric F P M Schoenmakers; Maura Massimino; Gabriella Sozzi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Leukaemia stem cells and the evolution of cancer-stem-cell research.

Authors:  Brian J P Huntly; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Chromosome arm 6q loss is the most common recurrent autosomal alteration detected in primary pediatric ependymoma.

Authors:  D A Reardon; R E Entrekin; J Sublett; S Ragsdale; H Li; J Boyett; J L Kepner; A T Look
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Identification of relevant prognostic histopathologic features in 69 intracranial ependymomas, excluding myxopapillary ependymomas and subependymomas.

Authors:  Erkan Kurt; Ping-Pin Zheng; Wim C J Hop; Marcel van der Weiden; Meike Bol; Martin J van den Bent; Cees J J Avezaat; Johan M Kros
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Postoperative chemotherapy without irradiation for ependymoma in children under 5 years of age: a multicenter trial of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology.

Authors:  J Grill; M C Le Deley; D Gambarelli; M A Raquin; D Couanet; A Pierre-Kahn; J L Habrand; F Doz; D Frappaz; J C Gentet; C Edan; P Chastagner; C Kalifa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Prognostic factors in infants and very young children with intracranial ependymomas.

Authors:  P K Duffner; J P Krischer; R A Sanford; M E Horowitz; P C Burger; M E Cohen; H S Friedman; L E Kun
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.162

7.  Correlation between localization, age, and chromosomal imbalances in ependymal tumours as detected by CGH.

Authors:  Judith W M Jeuken; Sandra H E Sprenger; Job Gilhuis; Hans L J M Teepen; Andre J Grotenhuis; Pieter Wesseling
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Clinical impact and functional aspects of tenascin-C expression during glioma progression.

Authors:  Christel Herold-Mende; Margareta M Mueller; Mario M Bonsanto; Horst Peter Schmitt; Stefan Kunze; Hans-Herbert Steiner
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Localization of a putative low-penetrance ependymoma susceptibility locus to 22q11 using a chromosome 22 tiling-path genomic microarray.

Authors:  Anneke C J Ammerlaan; Cecilia de Bustos; Abdelhay Ararou; Patrick G Buckley; Kiran K Mantripragada; Marco J Verstegen; Theo J M Hulsebos; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Genetic abnormalities detected in ependymomas by comparative genomic hybridisation.

Authors:  M Carter; J Nicholson; F Ross; J Crolla; R Allibone; V Balaji; R Perry; D Walker; R Gilbertson; D W Ellison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Genetic differences on intracranial versus spinal cord ependymal tumors: a meta-analysis of genetic researches.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Chi Heon Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  C11orf95-RELA fusions and upregulated NF-KB signalling characterise a subset of aggressive supratentorial ependymomas that express L1CAM and nestin.

Authors:  Prit Benny Malgulwar; Aruna Nambirajan; Pankaj Pathak; Mohammed Faruq; Madhu Rajeshwari; Manmohan Singh; Vaishali Suri; Chitra Sarkar; Mehar Chand Sharma
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  The biology of ependymomas and emerging novel therapies.

Authors:  Amr H Saleh; Nardin Samuel; Kyle Juraschka; Mohammad H Saleh; Michael D Taylor; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 69.800

Review 4.  The Similarities and Differences between Intracranial and Spinal Ependymomas : A Review from a Genetic Research Perspective.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Jung Hun Ohn; Chi Heon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-02-29

5.  Chromosome 1q gain and tenascin-C expression are candidate markers to define different risk groups in pediatric posterior fossa ependymoma.

Authors:  Asuka Araki; Monika Chocholous; Johannes Gojo; Christian Dorfer; Thomas Czech; Harald Heinzl; Karin Dieckmann; Inge M Ambros; Peter F Ambros; Irene Slavc; Christine Haberler
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 7.801

6.  Integrating Tenascin-C protein expression and 1q25 copy number status in pediatric intracranial ependymoma prognostication: A new model for risk stratification.

Authors:  Felipe Andreiuolo; Gwénaël Le Teuff; Mohamed Amine Bayar; John-Paul Kilday; Torsten Pietsch; André O von Bueren; Hendrik Witt; Andrey Korshunov; Piergiorgio Modena; Stefan M Pfister; Mélanie Pagès; David Castel; Felice Giangaspero; Leila Chimelli; Pascale Varlet; Stefan Rutkowski; Didier Frappaz; Maura Massimino; Richard Grundy; Jacques Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Pleiotropic Role of Tenascin-C in Central Nervous System Diseases: From Basic to Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Chen Hanmin; Zhou Xiangyue; Cameron Lenahan; Wang Ling; Ou Yibo; He Yue
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Identification of biomarkers and construction of a microRNA-mRNA regulatory network for ependymoma using integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Biao Yang; Jun-Xi Dai; Yuan-Bo Pan; Yan-Bin Ma; Sheng-Hua Chu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.967

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.