Literature DB >> 25391979

The role of resection alone in select children with intracranial ependymoma: the Canadian Pediatric Brain Tumour Consortium experience.

Tamir Ailon1, Christopher Dunham, Anne-Sophie Carret, Uri Tabori, P Daniel Mcneely, Shayna Zelcer, Beverley Wilson, Lucie Lafay-Cousin, Donna Johnston, David D Eisenstat, Marianna Silva, Nada Jabado, Karen Jane Goddard, Chris Fryer, Glenda Hendson, Cynthia Hawkins, Sandra Dunn, Stephen Yip, Ashutosh Singhal, Juliette Hukin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gross total resection (GTR) of intracranial ependymoma is an accepted goal. More controversial is radiotherapy deferral. This study reports on children treated with gross total resection who did not receive upfront adjuvant radiotherapy.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of children with intracranial ependymoma in 12 Canadian centers. Patients who had GTR of their tumor and no upfront radiotherapy were identified. Immunostaining was performed for Ki-67, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and EZH2 on archived tissue. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed and compared with those who had GTR followed by radiation.
RESULTS: Twenty-six children were identified treated with GTR alone at diagnosis; 12 posterior fossa ependymoma (PFE) WHO grade II, and 14 supratentorial ependymoma (STE). Progression-free survival (PFS) in ependymoma treated with GTR alone at diagnosis was inferior in those with high Ki-67 or positive EZH2 immunostaining. Survival was inferior for patients less than 2 years old at diagnosis (p = 0.002). Survival was comparable to PFE WHO grade II and STE who had GTR followed by radiation (p = 0.62). Five-year PFS and overall survival (OS) of those treated with GTR alone were 60 and 70% respectively for PFE and 45 and 70% respectively for STE (p = 0.2; 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there is a subset of children with certain biologic features who, in the setting of a prospective clinical trial, might be candidates for observation following GTR. Good risk factors for this approach include age of 2 years or older, low Ki-67, and negative EZH2. If relapse occurs, it may be confined to the primary site, allowing for possible salvage with GTR followed by XRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25391979     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-014-2575-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  24 in total

1.  Post-operative radiation improves survival in children younger than 3 years with intracranial ependymoma.

Authors:  Matthew Koshy; Shayna Rich; Thomas E Merchant; Usama Mahmood; William F Regine; Young Kwok
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Intracranial ependymomas in children: a critical review of prognostic factors and a plea for cooperation.

Authors:  E Bouffet; G Perilongo; A Canete; M Massimino
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1998-06

3.  Intracranial ependymoma: long-term results of a policy of surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  L J Vanuytsel; E M Bessell; S E Ashley; H J Bloom; M Brada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Delineation of two clinically and molecularly distinct subgroups of posterior fossa ependymoma.

Authors:  Hendrik Witt; Stephen C Mack; Marina Ryzhova; Sebastian Bender; Martin Sill; Ruth Isserlin; Axel Benner; Thomas Hielscher; Till Milde; Marc Remke; David T W Jones; Paul A Northcott; Livia Garzia; Kelsey C Bertrand; Andrea Wittmann; Yuan Yao; Stephen S Roberts; Luca Massimi; Tim Van Meter; William A Weiss; Nalin Gupta; Wiesia Grajkowska; Boleslaw Lach; Yoon-Jae Cho; Andreas von Deimling; Andreas E Kulozik; Olaf Witt; Gary D Bader; Cynthia E Hawkins; Uri Tabori; Abhijit Guha; James T Rutka; Peter Lichter; Andrey Korshunov; Michael D Taylor; Stefan M Pfister
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Long-term outcome in patients harboring intracranial ependymoma.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kawabata; Jun A Takahashi; Yoshiki Arakawa; Nobuo Hashimoto
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Emotional and behavioral functioning after conformal radiation therapy for pediatric ependymoma.

Authors:  Victoria W Willard; Heather M Conklin; Frederick A Boop; Shengjie Wu; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Supratentorial ependymomas of the first two decades of life. Long-term follow-up of 20 cases (including two subependymomas).

Authors:  L Palma; P Celli; G Cantore
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Predicting change in academic abilities after conformal radiation therapy for localized ependymoma.

Authors:  Heather M Conklin; Chenghong Li; Xiaoping Xiong; Robert J Ogg; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Prognosis of ependymoma.

Authors:  D Schiffer; M T Giordana
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Intracranial ependymoma long term outcome, patterns of failure.

Authors:  J J Kovalic; N Flaris; P W Grigsby; M Pirkowski; J R Simpson; K A Roth
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.130

View more
  8 in total

1.  Conformal Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Ependymoma, Chemotherapy for Incompletely Resected Ependymoma, and Observation for Completely Resected, Supratentorial Ependymoma.

Authors:  Thomas E Merchant; Anne E Bendel; Noah D Sabin; Peter C Burger; Dennis W Shaw; Eric Chang; Shengjie Wu; Tianni Zhou; David D Eisenstat; Nicholas K Foreman; Christine E Fuller; Edwina Templeton Anderson; Juliette Hukin; Ching C Lau; Ian F Pollack; Fred H Laningham; Robert H Lustig; Floyd D Armstrong; Michael H Handler; Chris Williams-Hughes; Sandra Kessel; Mehmet Kocak; David W Ellison; Vijay Ramaswamy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Analysis on therapeutic outcomes and prognostic factors of intracranial ependymoma: a report of 49 clinical cases in a single center.

Authors:  Jingliang Ye; Junle Zhu; Jiayi Yan; Peiqin Chen; Zhiping Wan; Feng Chen; Lei Zhang; Jun Qian; Chun Luo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Advances in Management of Pediatric Ependymomas.

Authors:  Frank Y Lin; Murali Chintagumpala
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  EZH2 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis in patients with glioma.

Authors:  Yanyang Zhang; Xinguang Yu; Ling Chen; Zhibin Zhang; Shiyu Feng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-03

5.  The role of postoperative radiotherapy in pediatric patients with grade II intracranial ependymomas: a population-based, propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Xiangyang Deng; Dongdong Lin; Lisheng Yu; Xingxing Xu; Nu Zhang; Hui Zhou; Hansong Sheng; Bo Yin; Fengchun Lin; Shangyu Xu; Dandong Li; Junhao Fang; Xiangqi Lu; Jian Lin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Do We Need Radiotherapy in Grade II Ependymoma?

Authors:  Aleksandra Napieralska; Wojciech Majewski; Leszek Miszczyk
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Spinal ependymoma in a patient with Kabuki syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Davide Roma; Paolo Palma; Rossella Capolino; Lorenzo Figà-Talamanca; Francesca Diomedi-Camassei; Francesca Romana Lepri; Maria Cristina Digilio; Carlo Efisio Marras; Raffaella Messina; Andrea Carai; Franco Randi; Angela Mastronuzzi
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  Polish Multi-Institutional Study of Children with Ependymoma-Clinical Practice Outcomes in the Light of Prospective Trials.

Authors:  Aleksandra Napieralska; Agnieszka Mizia-Malarz; Weronika Stolpa; Ewa Pawłowska; Małgorzata A Krawczyk; Katarzyna Konat-Bąska; Aneta Kaczorowska; Arkadiusz Brąszewski; Maciej Harat
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.