Literature DB >> 22950002

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Dismembered Pyeloplasty with or without Ureteral Stenting in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

June Kim1, Sungchan Park, Hyunho Hwang, Jong Won Kim, Sang Hyeon Cheon, Seonghun Park, Kun Suk Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of temporary internal ureteral stents on the surgical outcomes of dismembered pyeloplasty in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 70 children (76 renal units) who underwent dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction at at Asan Medical Center between January 2005 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. We classified the renal units into the stented group (22 renal units) and the nonstented group (54 renal units). Fifty-four of 70 patients were male and their mean age was 2.2±3.8 years old. The mean follow-up period was 29.6±16.8 months.
RESULTS: Sixty-four children had unilateral UPJ obstruction. The mean stent duration was 31.9 days. As shown by evaluation of radiologic images, there were no significant differences between the stented group and the nonstented group during the follow-up period (p>0.05). The mean preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior pelvic diameters (APPDs) of the nonstented group were 31.3 mm and 15.1 mm, respectively (p<0.001). The preoperative and postoperative grades of hydronephrosis were 3.9 and 2.9, respectively (p=0.037). The mean preoperative and postoperative APPDs of the stented group were 36.4 mm and 15.6 mm, respectively (p<0.001). The preoperative and postoperative grades of hydronephrosis were 4 and 3.1, respectively (p<0.001). Repeat obstruction was shown in 4 subjects as a postoperative complication (5.7%). Two children from each group had recurrent UPJ obstruction, with percentages of 3.7% and 9%, respectively (p=0.575).
CONCLUSIONS: In a comparison of nonstented and stented groups during pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction, no significant differences were found in the resolution of hydronephrosis or overall postoperative complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child; Hydronephrosis; Stents; Ureteral obstruction

Year:  2012        PMID: 22950002      PMCID: PMC3427842          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.8.564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  26 in total

Review 1.  Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen E Smith; Nicholas Holmes; Jeremy I Lieb; James Mandell; Laurence S Baskin; Barry A Kogan; R Dixon Walker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  "Well-tempered" diuresis renography: its historical development, physiological and technical pitfalls, and standardized technique protocol.

Authors:  J J Conway
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Does early detection of ureteropelvic junction obstruction improve surgical outcome in terms of renal function?

Authors:  B Chertin; A Fridmans; M Knizhnik; I Hadas-Halperin; D Hain; A Farkas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Improving splintage techniques in pyeloplasty.

Authors:  G N Sibley; M D Graham; M L Smith; P T Doyle
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1987-12

5.  Postoperative diuresis renography and ultrasound in patients undergoing pyeloplasty. Predictors of surgical outcome.

Authors:  M G Neste; R P du Cret; D E Finlay; S Sane; R Gonzalez; R J Boudreau; C C Kuni
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty.

Authors:  P H O'Reilly; P J Brooman; S Mak; M Jones; C Pickup; C Atkinson; A J Pollard
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Nephrostomy tube drainage with pyeloplasty: is it necessarily a bad choice?

Authors:  P F Austin; M P Cain; R C Rink
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong Mei; Jiarui Pu; Chunlei Yang; Huanyu Zhang; Liduan Zheng; Qiangsong Tong
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Complications and length of hospital stay following stented and unstented paediatric pyeloplasties.

Authors:  S Hussain; J D Frank
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1994-01

10.  Dismembered pyeloplasty in infants under the age of 12 months.

Authors:  H H Woo; R H Farnsworth
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents.

Authors:  Linda C Lee; Niki Kanaroglou; Joseph M Gleason; Joao L Pippi Salle; Darius J Bägli; Martin A Koyle; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Surgical Approaches to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Ryan W Tubre; John M Gatti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Comparison of outcomes between 2 week versus 4 week stenting in pediatric pyeloplasty-A single centre observational study.

Authors:  Santosh Dey; Venkat Shankar Raman; Tarun Peela; Karunesh Chand; Naveen Chandra
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2019-11-02

4.  Use of double-J ureteric stents post-laparoscopic pyeloplasty to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction in hydronephrosis for pediatric patients: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Haobo Zhu; Jun Wang; Yongji Deng; Liqu Huang; Xiaojiang Zhu; Jun Dong; Jintong Sha; Nannan Gu; Zheng Ge; Geng Ma; Yunfei Guo; Aihua Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Outcome after Stented and Nonstented Anderson-Hynes Dismembered Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Nilesh G Nagdeve; Pravin D Bhingare; Prashant Sarawade
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.