Literature DB >> 12184561

The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: present and accounted for.

Thomas C Toppino1, Yoko Hara, Jessica Hackman.   

Abstract

Memory performance nearly always improves as a function of the spacing between repetitions. However, previous studies indicated that college students exhibited no spacing effect in the free recall of lists composed exclusively of words sampled from a single semantic category. We explored this puzzling phenomenon in two experiments. We found that the spacing effect in free recall can occur with homogeneous lists. Most interestingly, the effect seems to depend on the number of items (lag) separating spaced repetitions. Short lags between spaced repetitions yield a spacing effect, whereas longer lags do not.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12184561     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  The spacing effect, free recall, and two-process theory: a closer look.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Lance C Bloom
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.

Authors:  K Braun; D C Rubin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1998-01

3.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.

Authors:  A M Glenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-03

4.  What is the role of affect in the spacing effect?

Authors:  D G Elmes; C J Dye; N J Herdelin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-03
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Melodie D Fearnow-Kenney; Marissa H Kiepert; Amanda C Teremula
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

2.  Parallels between spacing effects during behavioral and cellular learning.

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Zrinka Sosic-Vasic
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: the optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval.

Authors:  Carolina E Küpper-Tetzel; Irina V Kapler; Melody Wiseheart
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-07

4.  Very similar spacing-effect patterns in very different learning/practice domains.

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Manfred Spitzer; Zrinka Sosic-Vasic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.