Literature DB >> 19246346

The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.

Thomas C Toppino1, Melodie D Fearnow-Kenney, Marissa H Kiepert, Amanda C Teremula.   

Abstract

Preschoolers, elementary school children, and college students exhibited a spacing effect in the free recall of pictures when learning was intentional. When learning was incidental and a shallow processing task requiring little semantic processing was used during list presentation, young adults still exhibited a spacing effect, but children consistently failed to do so. Children, however, did manifest a spacing effect in incidental learning when an elaborate semantic processing task was used. These results limit the hypothesis that the spacing effect in free recall occurs automatically and constrain theoretical accounts of why the spacing between repetitions affects recall performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19246346     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.3.316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  The spacing effect, free recall, and two-process theory: a closer look.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Lance C Bloom
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall.

Authors:  Peter P J L Verkoeijen; Remy M J P Rikers; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The spacing effect in young children's free recall: support for automatic-process explanations.

Authors:  T C Toppino
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03

4.  Electrophysiological correlates of word repetition spacing: ERP and induced band power old/new effects with massed and spaced repetitions.

Authors:  Jan W Van Strien; Peter P J L Verkoeijen; Nelly Van der Meer; Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Limitations to the spacing effect: demonstration of an inverted u-shaped relationship between interrepetition spacing and free recall.

Authors:  Peter P J L Verkoeijen; Remy M J P Rikers; Henk G Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2005

6.  The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.

Authors:  K Braun; D C Rubin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1998-01

7.  Revising current two-process accounts of spacing effects in memory.

Authors:  R Russo; A J Parkin; S R Taylor; J Wilks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval.

Authors:  D A Balota; J M Duchek; R Paullin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-03

9.  The spacing effect in 4- to 9-year-old children.

Authors:  C P Rea; V Modigliani
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-09

10.  Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition.

Authors:  A M Glenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  A retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall.

Authors:  Lynn L Siegel; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Between-list lag effects in recall depend on retention interval.

Authors:  Mary A Pyc; David A Balota; Kathleen B McDermott; Tim Tully; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08

Review 3.  Review of Simulation in Pediatrics: The Evolution of a Revolution.

Authors:  Rahul Ojha; Anthony Liu; Deepak Rai; Ralph Nanan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.418

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.