PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation (RT) with concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), to estimate their progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and to assess the role of (11)C methionine PET (MET-PET) imaging in predicting recurrence. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) doses of 66 to 81 Gy, assigned to patients by the time-to-event continual reassessment method, were delivered over 6 weeks with concurrent daily temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) followed by adjuvant cyclic temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) d1-5 q28d ×6 cycles). Treatment was based on gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Pretreatment MET-PET scans were obtained for correlation with eventual sites of failure. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 54 months for patients who remain alive. Late CNS grade ≥III toxicity was observed at 78 (2 of 7 patients) and 81 Gy (1 of 9 patients). None of 22 patients receiving 75 or less Gy developed RT necrosis. Median OS and PFS were 20.1 (14.0-32.5) and 9.0 (6.0-11.7) months, respectively. Twenty-two of 32 patients with pretreatment MET-PET uptake showed uptake beyond the contrast-enhanced MRI. Patients whose treatment did not include the region of increased MET-PET uptake showed an increased risk of noncentral failure (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GBM can safely receive standard temozolomide with 75 Gy in 30 fractions, delivered using IMRT. The median OS of 20.1 months is promising. Furthermore, MET-PET appears to predict regions of high risk of recurrence not defined by MRI, suggesting that further improvements may be possible by targeting metabolically active regions.
PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of radiation (RT) with concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), to estimate their progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and to assess the role of (11)C methionine PET (MET-PET) imaging in predicting recurrence. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) doses of 66 to 81 Gy, assigned to patients by the time-to-event continual reassessment method, were delivered over 6 weeks with concurrent daily temozolomide (75 mg/m(2)) followed by adjuvant cyclic temozolomide (200 mg/m(2) d1-5 q28d ×6 cycles). Treatment was based on gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Pretreatment MET-PET scans were obtained for correlation with eventual sites of failure. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 54 months for patients who remain alive. Late CNS grade ≥III toxicity was observed at 78 (2 of 7 patients) and 81 Gy (1 of 9 patients). None of 22 patients receiving 75 or less Gy developed RT necrosis. Median OS and PFS were 20.1 (14.0-32.5) and 9.0 (6.0-11.7) months, respectively. Twenty-two of 32 patients with pretreatment MET-PET uptake showed uptake beyond the contrast-enhanced MRI. Patients whose treatment did not include the region of increased MET-PET uptake showed an increased risk of noncentral failure (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with GBM can safely receive standard temozolomide with 75 Gy in 30 fractions, delivered using IMRT. The median OS of 20.1 months is promising. Furthermore, MET-PET appears to predict regions of high risk of recurrence not defined by MRI, suggesting that further improvements may be possible by targeting metabolically active regions.
Authors: Anca-Ligia Grosu; Wolfgang A Weber; Eva Riedel; Branislav Jeremic; Carsten Nieder; Martina Franz; Hartmut Gumprecht; Ruprecht Jaeger; Markus Schwaiger; Michael Molls Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J Lee Villano; Cindy A Collins; Elisabet E Manasanch; Charulata Ramaprasad; Koen van Besien Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Andreas H Jacobs; Anne Thomas; Lutz W Kracht; Huongfeng Li; Claus Dittmar; Guido Garlip; Norbert Galldiks; Johannes C Klein; Jan Sobesky; Rüdiger Hilker; Stefan Vollmar; Karl Herholz; Klaus Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Anca L Grosu; Wolfgang A Weber; Martina Franz; Sibylle Stärk; Morand Piert; Reinhard Thamm; Hartmut Gumprecht; Markus Schwaiger; Michael Molls; Carsten Nieder Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lutz W Kracht; Hrvoje Miletic; Susanne Busch; Andreas H Jacobs; Jurgen Voges; Moritz Hoevels; Johannes C Klein; Karl Herholz; Wolf-D Heiss Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S W Lee; B A Fraass; L H Marsh; K Herbort; S S Gebarski; M K Martel; E H Radany; A S Lichter; H M Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jeremy D Ruben; Michael Dally; Michael Bailey; Robin Smith; Catriona A McLean; Pasqual Fedele Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daekeun You; Michelle M Kim; Madhava P Aryal; Hemant Parmar; Morand Piert; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2017-11-15
Authors: Andrew Elson; Eric Paulson; Joseph Bovi; Malika Siker; Chris Schultz; Peter S Laviolette Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jiayi Huang; Pamela Samson; Stephanie M Perkins; George Ansstas; Milan G Chheda; Todd A DeWees; Christina I Tsien; Clifford G Robinson; Jian L Campian Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: A P Krishnan; R Karunamuni; K M Leyden; T M Seibert; R L Delfanti; J M Kuperman; H Bartsch; P Elbe; A Srikant; A M Dale; S Kesari; D E Piccioni; J A Hattangadi-Gluth; N Farid; C R McDonald; N S White Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A Zygogianni; M Protopapa; A Kougioumtzopoulou; F Simopoulou; S Nikoloudi; V Kouloulias Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Christopher H Chapman; Thomas Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken; Christina I Tsien; Yue Cao Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 3.609