Literature DB >> 12176768

Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments.

P M Arezes1, A S Miguel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although hearing protectors must be used as a temporary solution, their choice should take into account several aspects, such as ergonomic features, associated with this device. The present study aims to analyse the relationship between the acoustical attenuation efficiency and other aspects related to the comfort afforded by hearing protectors and, consequently, their acceptability when used in industrial noisy environments.
METHODS: An evaluation of comfort was performed using a questionnaire, completed by 20 workers. Several scales related to the subjective feeling of comfort were used to quantify the comfort index of a given protector. Simultaneously, the time of usage of each protector was self-recorded by each subject. To test the relationship between the comfort index and the time during which protectors were used, a two-way analysis of variance (two-way ANOVA) was applied. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained seem to demonstrate that there are significant differences between catalogued and effective attenuation. Protectors with less catalogued attenuation, but with higher acceptability, i.e. which were more comfortable, tended to be more efficient than protectors with a higher catalogued attenuation, but which were less comfortable. Finally, it must be emphasized that high efficiency can only be achieved through the attainment of an adequate balance between the range of parameters likely to determine its usage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12176768     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mef067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  8 in total

1.  Prevalence of hearing protection device non-use among noise-exposed US workers in 2007 and 2014.

Authors:  Deirdre R Green; Elizabeth A Masterson; Christa L Themann
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Indicators of hearing protection use: self-report and researcher observation.

Authors:  Stephanie C Griffin; Richard Neitzel; William E Daniell; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Do hearing protectors protect hearing?

Authors:  Matthew R Groenewold; Elizabeth A Masterson; Christa L Themann; Rickie R Davis
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Hearing loss as a predictor for hearing protection attenuation among miners.

Authors:  Elon D Ullman; Lauren M Smith; Marjorie C McCullagh; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.948

5.  Musician earplugs: Appreciation and protection.

Authors:  Annelies Bockstael; Hannah Keppler; Dick Botteldooren
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

Review 6.  Current insights in noise-induced hearing loss: a literature review of the underlying mechanism, pathophysiology, asymmetry, and management options.

Authors:  Trung N Le; Louise V Straatman; Jane Lea; Brian Westerberg
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-23

7.  The study of attenuation levels and the comfort of earplugs.

Authors:  Alessandra G Samelli; Raquel F Gomes; Tiago V Chammas; Bárbara G Silva; Renata R Moreira; Ana C Fiorini
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Prevalence of high frequency hearing loss consistent with noise exposure among people working with sound systems and general population in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Regina P El Dib; Edina M K Silva; José F Morais; Virgínia F M Trevisani
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.