Literature DB >> 12173774

Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria by the Phoenix Automated Microbiology System.

A Endimiani1, F Luzzaro, A Tamborini, G Lombardi, V Elia, R Belloni, A Toniolo.   

Abstract

The Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD) was evaluated for its ability to identify nonfermenting gram-negative pathogens and measure their drug susceptibility. Isolates producing rare extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (PER-1, IMP-2, VIM-1, and VIM-2) were included in the study. Species identification was compared to that given by the ATB System (bio-Mérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), whereas susceptibility results were compared to those produced by a reference broth microdilution test (panels manufactured by Pasco Laboratories, Becton Dickinson). The Phoenix system consistently identified all isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 55) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 28), while in other cases species agreement was obtained for 47/53 isolates (Acinetobacter baumannii, 29/31; Pseudomonas putida, 10/11; Burkholderia cepacia, 6/7; and Pseudomonas fluorescens, 2/4). Overall, the Phoenix and ATB systems gave equal results in 130/136 cases (95.6%). For two isolates, consistent identification was obtained at the genus level, thus bringing the cumulative agreement to 97.1%. MIC values (interpreted according to NCCLS guidelines) gave essential and categorical agreement in 94.2% and 93.1% of cases, respectively. Minor and major errors were 5.1% and 5.2%, respectively. No very major errors were produced. The mean time to results (TTR) for the Phoenix system was 14.8 +/- 1.6 h (mean +/- SD), with the shortest TTR being observedfor A. baumannii (13.0 +/- 1.8 h) and the longest one for P. aeruginosa (15.6 +/- 1.2 h). In conclusion, the Phoenix system performed rapidly and correctly in the identification of clinical isolates of important opportunistic pathogens and in measuring their susceptibility to antipseudomonal drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12173774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Microbiol        ISSN: 1121-7138            Impact factor:   2.479


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated identification and susceptibility testing system in clinical microbiology laboratory practice.

Authors:  E Stefaniuk; A Baraniak; M Gniadkowski; W Hryniewicz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of the automated phoenix system for potential routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  J-L Donay; D Mathieu; P Fernandes; C Prégermain; P Bruel; A Wargnier; I Casin; F X Weill; P H Lagrange; J L Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Manual and automated instrumentation for identification of Enterobacteriaceae and other aerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  Caroline M O'hara
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Use of the MicroSeq 500 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing for identification of bacterial isolates that commercial automated systems failed to identify correctly.

Authors:  Carla Fontana; Marco Favaro; Marco Pelliccioni; Enrico Salvatore Pistoia; Cartesio Favalli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Analysis of the comparative workflow and performance characteristics of the VITEK 2 and Phoenix systems.

Authors:  U Eigner; A Schmid; U Wild; D Bertsch; A-M Fahr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Two-center collaborative evaluation of performance of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Menozzi; Ulrich Eigner; Silvia Covan; Sabina Rossi; Pietro Somenzi; Giuseppe Dettori; Carlo Chezzi; Anne-Marie Fahr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Phoenix 100 versus Vitek 2 in the identification of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kalliopi-Stavroula Chatzigeorgiou; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Sotirios Tsiodras; Stavros J Hamodrakas; Pantelis G Bagos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparative evaluation of Bruker Biotyper and BD Phoenix systems for identification of bacterial pathogens associated with urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Yingjun Yan; Shufang Meng; Dongmo Bian; Criziel Quinn; Haijing Li; Charles W Stratton; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen.

Authors:  Anton Y Peleg; Harald Seifert; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Direct comparison of the BD phoenix system with the MicroScan WalkAway system for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  J W Snyder; G K Munier; C L Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.