Literature DB >> 12171228

Are guidelines ethical? Some considerations for general practice.

Wendy A Rogers1.   

Abstract

Guidelines have been promoted in various roles in general practice, e.g. to improve quality of care, to assist patient decision making, and to improve resource allocation. This paper examines these claims using ethical analysis. Guidelines may help general practitioners to act for thegood of their patients and avoid harm; but, on their own, guidelines cannot ensure quality of care or the protection of patients' interests. Patient choice may be limited rather than enhanced by following guideline recommendations. Guidelines contribute to rationing of resources but do not use explicit citeria for this. The ethical implications for guideline use are complex and far-reaching

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12171228      PMCID: PMC1314388     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  35 in total

1.  Is it time to review the idea of compliance with guidelines?

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal.

Authors:  M Holmes-Rovner; H Llewellyn-Thomas; V Entwistle; A Coulter; A O'Connor; D R Rovner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-17

3.  Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  T Bodenheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  General practitioners' use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them.

Authors:  C Watkins; I Harvey; C Langley; S Gray; A Faulkner
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The failings of NICE.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-02

7.  Wrong SIGN, NICE mess: is national guidance distorting allocation of resources?

Authors:  R Cookson; D McDaid; A Maynard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-29

8.  Blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: clinical performance of general practitioners.

Authors:  B D Frijling; T H Spies; C M Lobo; M E Hulscher; B B van Drenth; J C Braspenning; A Prins; J C van der Wouden; R P Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Evidence-based medicine in practice: limiting or facilitating patient choice?

Authors:  Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Applying research evidence to individuals in primary care: a study using non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  N Oswald; H Bateman
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  15 in total

1.  Helping doctors with disabilities succeed in medicine.

Authors:  Ruth Chambers; Rhona MacDonald; Stewart Mercer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  An oral history of general practice 6: Beyond the practice: the changing relationship with secondary care.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Malcolm Nicolson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Care or control in the community?

Authors:  Helen Lester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Effects of communicating individual risks in screening programmes: Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Silvana Unigwe; Glyn Elwyn; Kerenza Hood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-27

Review 5.  Ethics of evidence based medicine in the primary care setting.

Authors:  A Slowther; S Ford; T Schofield
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  A qualitative study of barriers to the use of statins and the implementation of coronary heart disease prevention in primary care.

Authors:  John Kedward; Lorraine Dakin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  The involvement of gynaecological patients in the development of a clinical guideline for resumption of (work) activities in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Carina A C M Pittens; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Saskia C van Veen; Johannes R Anema; Judith A F Huirne; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Satisfying patients' rights in Iran: Providing effective strategies.

Authors:  Zohreh Anbari; Mehri Mohammadi; Magid Taheri
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

9.  Everyday ethics: learning from an 'ordinary' consultation in general practice.

Authors:  Caroline Allison
Journal:  London J Prim Care (Abingdon)       Date:  2011-07

Review 10.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.