Literature DB >> 12166687

Binaural masking level difference for speech signals in noise.

Magnus S K Johansson1, Stig D Arlinger.   

Abstract

This study investigates the binaural masking level difference in both detection and recognition of speech embedded in noise when the signal is phase-shifted 180 degrees between the left and the right ear. Swedish spondaic words masked by noise werc presented binaurally to 10 normally hearing subjects. The results are presented in terms of speech detection threshold, speech recognition threshold, a psychometric function of speech recognition versus signal-to-noise ratio, and speech intelligibility as a function of binaural intelligibility level difference. Both speech detection threshold and speech intelligibility improved when the speech signal was phase-shifted 180 degrees. The binaural intelligibility level difference ranged from 5.7 to 7.7 dB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12166687     DOI: 10.3109/14992020209077187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  8 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Informational masking and spatial hearing in listeners with and without unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Ann M Rothpletz; Frederic L Wightman; Doris J Kistler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The effect of different cochlear implant microphones on acoustic hearing individuals' binaural benefits for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Daniel J Freed; Laurel M Fisher; Ivan Pal; Sigfrid D Soli
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Correlation Analysis Between the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Psychophysical Measurement of Spatial Hearing.

Authors:  Farzaneh Zamiri Abdollahi; Maryam Delphi; Vafa Delphi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-06-06

6.  The binaural masking-level difference of mandarin tone detection and the binaural intelligibility-level difference of mandarin tone recognition in the presence of speech-spectrum noise.

Authors:  Cheng-Yu Ho; Pei-Chun Li; Yuan-Chuan Chiang; Shuenn-Tsong Young; Woei-Chyn Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Feasibility of remote assessment of the binaural intelligibility level difference in school-age children.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Claire Dorey; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  JASA Express Lett       Date:  2021-01

8.  Low-level information and high-level perception: the case of speech in noise.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.