Literature DB >> 12154331

Early and late QRS morphology and width in biventricular pacing: relationship to lead site and electrical remodeling.

Renato Ricci1, Carlo Pignalberi, Gerardo Ansalone, Enzo Jannone, Maria Vittoria Vaccaro, Alessandra Denaro, Sergio Cavaglià, Massimo Santini.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: 48 patients (40 Male), mean age 68 +/- 8 years, in III-IV class, with intraventricular conduction delay, received a biventricular pacemaker. Heart failure aetiology was non-ischemic in 60%. Left ventricular lead positioning was inferior in 5 patients (10%), posterior in 12 (25%), lateral in 18 (37%) and anterior in 13 (27%). QRS duration and axis were evaluated in sinus rhythm, and during right ventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing, the last early after implant and late after 8.8 +/- 4.3 months. QRS duration (ms) was 154 +/- 29 in sinus rhythm, 175 +/- 28 during right ventricular pacing, 196 +/- 31 during left ventricular pacing, 122 +/- 23 during biventricular pacing "early" and 120 +/- 18 during biventricular pacing "late." All the differences were statistically significant, but not between "early" and "late" biventricular pacing. Mean QRS axis ( degrees ) was -27 +/- 32 in sinus rhythm, -75 +/- 4 during right ventricular pacing, 112 +/- 41 during left ventricular pacing, -82 +/- 51 during biventricular pacing "early" and -80 +/- 42 during biventricular pacing "late." Only the difference between left ventricular pacing and all the other groups was statistically significant. QRS axis did not significantly differ according to left ventricular lead site during left and biventricular pacing. "Late" compared with "early" biventricular pacing axis showed variation >30 degrees in 35% of patients, in spite of no significant changes in QRS duration and x-ray positioning.
CONCLUSION: Biventricular pacing significantly reduced QRS width, which persisted long-term. Left and biventricular pacing axis was poorly related to left ventricular lead positioning. Biventricular pacing axis variability over time may suggest a role of electrical remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12154331     DOI: 10.1023/a:1019570022647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

1.  Reversal of left ventricular remodeling by synchronous biventricular pacing in heart failure.

Authors:  C P Lau; C M Yu; E Chau; K Fan; H F Tse; K Lee; M O Tang; S H Wan; T C Law; P Y Lee; Y M Lam; M R Hill
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 2.  Multisite stimulation in refractory heart failure.

Authors:  G Ansalone; P Trambaiolo; G P Giorda; P Giannantoni; R Ricci; M Santini
Journal:  G Ital Cardiol       Date:  1999-04

3.  Permanent left ventricular pacing with transvenous leads inserted into the coronary veins.

Authors:  J C Daubert; P Ritter; H Le Breton; D Gras; C Leclercq; A Lazarus; J Mugica; P Mabo; S Cazeau
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Predictors of systolic augmentation from left ventricular preexcitation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and intraventricular conduction delay.

Authors:  G S Nelson; C W Curry; B T Wyman; A Kramer; J Declerck; M Talbot; M R Douglas; R D Berger; E R McVeigh; D A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation.

Authors:  K D Aaronson; J S Schwartz; T M Chen; K L Wong; J E Goin; D M Mancini
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Electrocardiographic remodeling in patients paced for heart failure.

Authors:  J Vogt; O Krahnefeld; B Lamp; B Hansky; H Kirkels; K Minami; R Körfer; D Horstkotte; M Kloss; A Auricchio
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-11-02       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Multisite pacing for end-stage heart failure: early experience.

Authors:  S Cazeau; P Ritter; A Lazarus; D Gras; H Backdach; O Mundler; J Mugica
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Functional abnormalities in isolated left bundle branch block. The effect of interventricular asynchrony.

Authors:  C L Grines; T M Bashore; H Boudoulas; S Olson; P Shafer; C F Wooley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Natural history of abnormal conduction and its relation to prognosis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  H B Xiao; C Roy; S Fujimoto; D G Gibson
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Four chamber pacing in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  S Cazeau; P Ritter; S Bakdach; A Lazarus; M Limousin; L Henao; O Mundler; J C Daubert; J Mugica
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  5 in total

1.  Manifest cardiac memory after biventricular pacing in a super-responder patient: Is memory the sign of a 'forgotten' electrical ventricular pattern?

Authors:  Andrea Di Cori; Giulio Zucchelli; Ezio Soldati; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2011-08-27

2.  Relationship between mechanical and electrical remodelling in patients with cardiac resynchronization implanted defibrillators.

Authors:  Nicolas Lellouche; Carlos De Diego; Noel G Boyle; Isaac Wiener; Gina Akopyan; John S Child; Kalyanam Shivkumar
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Electrocardiographic follow-up of biventricular pacemakers.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg; Michael Giudici
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Cardiac memory in humans: vectocardiographic quantification in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Luigi Padeletti; Chiara Fantappiè; Laura Perrotta; Giuseppe Ricciardi; Paolo Pieragnoli; Marco Chiostri; Sergio Valsecchi; Maria Cristina Porciani; Antonio Michelucci; Fabio Fantini
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Electrocardiographic clues to identify nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Firas H El Sabbagh; Osler Jay J Guzon; Martin A Alpert; Greg C Flaker
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.