AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with reverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling. However, the effects of CRT-induced mechanical remodelling on electrical remodelling, and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias have not been clearly established. We studied the relationship between mechanical remodelling, electrical remodelling, and the occurrence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy 1 year after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data from 45 patients who underwent ICD-CRT implantation at our centre. Significant LV reverse remodelling was defined by a minimum 10% decrease in the LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) at 1 year of follow-up. Electrocardiographic indices of dispersion of repolarization [QTc, Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) and their dispersion] were measured immediately and 1 year post-CRT implantation. The occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy was noted for each patient. Patients with (n= 21) and without (n= 24) significant LV reverse remodelling had similar baseline characteristics. At 1 year of follow-up, patients with mechanical reverse LV remodelling exhibited a significant decrease in QTc (505 ± 42 vs. 485 ± 52 ms, P < 0.05) and Tp-e (107 ± 26 vs. 92 ± 22 ms, P < 0.0001). However, patients without mechanical LV reverse remodelling exhibited a significant increase in QT dispersion (29 ± 43 vs. 98 ± 47 ms, P = 0.002) and Tp-e dispersion (22 ± 21 vs. 54 ± 36 ms, P = 0.0001). Finally patients with mechanical LV reverse remodelling experienced a lower rate of ICD therapy (P = 0.0025) after a mean follow-up of 19 months. CONCLUSION: Reverse LV mechanical remodelling is associated with reversal of electrical remodelling and a lower rate of appropriate ICD therapy following CRT.
AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with reverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling. However, the effects of CRT-induced mechanical remodelling on electrical remodelling, and the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias have not been clearly established. We studied the relationship between mechanical remodelling, electrical remodelling, and the occurrence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy 1 year after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data from 45 patients who underwent ICD-CRT implantation at our centre. Significant LV reverse remodelling was defined by a minimum 10% decrease in the LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd) at 1 year of follow-up. Electrocardiographic indices of dispersion of repolarization [QTc, Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) and their dispersion] were measured immediately and 1 year post-CRT implantation. The occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy was noted for each patient. Patients with (n= 21) and without (n= 24) significant LV reverse remodelling had similar baseline characteristics. At 1 year of follow-up, patients with mechanical reverse LV remodelling exhibited a significant decrease in QTc (505 ± 42 vs. 485 ± 52 ms, P < 0.05) and Tp-e (107 ± 26 vs. 92 ± 22 ms, P < 0.0001). However, patients without mechanical LV reverse remodelling exhibited a significant increase in QT dispersion (29 ± 43 vs. 98 ± 47 ms, P = 0.002) and Tp-e dispersion (22 ± 21 vs. 54 ± 36 ms, P = 0.0001). Finally patients with mechanical LV reverse remodelling experienced a lower rate of ICD therapy (P = 0.0025) after a mean follow-up of 19 months. CONCLUSION: Reverse LV mechanical remodelling is associated with reversal of electrical remodelling and a lower rate of appropriate ICD therapy following CRT.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-06-16 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Thomas P Cappola; Manya R Harsch; Mariell Jessup; William T Abraham; James B Young; Susan Petersen-Stejskal; Ted Plappert; Martin St John Sutton Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Peter Carson; Inder Anand; Christopher O'Connor; Brian Jaski; Jonathan Steinberg; Amy Lwin; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Jalal Ghali; Jalil Ghali; Jodi H Barnet; Arthur M Feldman; Michael R Bristow Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jesus Castro Hevia; Charles Antzelevitch; Francisco Tornés Bárzaga; Margarita Dorantes Sánchez; Francisco Dorticós Balea; Roberto Zayas Molina; Miguel A Quiñones Pérez; Yanela Fayad Rodríguez Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-04-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Walter P Abhayaratna; James B Seward; Christopher P Appleton; Pamela S Douglas; Jae K Oh; A Jamil Tajik; Teresa S M Tsang Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Martin G St John Sutton; Ted Plappert; Kathryn E Hilpisch; William T Abraham; David L Hayes; Edward Chinchoy Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John G F Cleland; Jean-Claude Daubert; Erland Erdmann; Nick Freemantle; Daniel Gras; Lukas Kappenberger; Luigi Tavazzi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: András Mihály Boros; Gábor Széplaki; Péter Perge; Zsigmond Jenei; Zsolt Bagyura; Endre Zima; Levente Molnár; Astrid Apor; Dávid Becker; László Gellér; Zoltán Prohászka; Béla Merkely Journal: Europace Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Christian Eickholt; Marcus Siekiera; Kiriakos Kirmanoglou; Astrid Rodenbeck; Nicole Heussen; Patrick Schauerte; Artur Lichtenberg; Jan Balzer; Tienush Rassaf; Stefan Perings; Malte Kelm; Dong-In Shin; Christian Meyer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 3.240