Literature DB >> 30230191

Expansion of the Liver Donor Supply Through Greater Use of Split-Liver Transplantation: Identifying Optimal Recipients.

Douglas B Mogul1, Xun Luo2, Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang2, Mary G Bowring2, Allan B Massie2,3, Kathleen B Schwarz1, Andrew M Cameron2, John F P Bridges4, Dorry L Segev2,3.   

Abstract

The increased use of split-liver transplantation (SLT) represents a strategy to increase the supply of organs. Although outcomes after SLT and whole liver transplantation (WLT) are similar on average among pediatric recipients, we hypothesized that the relationship between graft type and outcomes may vary depending on patient, donor, and surgical characteristics. We evaluated graft survival among pediatric (<18 years) deceased donor, liver-only transplant recipients from March 2002 until December 2015 using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft survival was assessed in a Cox proportional hazards model, with and without effect modification between graft type and donor, recipient, and surgical characteristics, to identify conditions where the risk of graft loss for SLT and WLT were similar. In a traditional multivariable model, characteristics associated with graft loss included donor age >50 years, recipient weight <10 kg, acute hepatic necrosis, autoimmune diseases, tumor, public insurance, and cold ischemia time (CIT) >8 hours. In an analysis that explored whether these characteristics modified the relationship between graft type and graft loss, many characteristics associated with loss actually had similar outcomes regardless of graft type, including weight <10 kg, acute hepatic necrosis, autoimmune diseases, and tumor. In contrast, several subgroups had worse outcomes when SLT was used, including recipient weight 10-35 kg, non-biliary atresia cholestasis, and metabolic disease. Allocation score, share type, or CIT did not modify risk of graft type and graft failure. Although one might anticipate that individuals with higher rates of graft loss would be worse candidates for SLT, data suggest that these patients actually have similar rates of graft loss. These findings can guide surgical decision making and may support policy changes that promote the increased use of SLT for specific pediatric recipients.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30230191      PMCID: PMC6320274          DOI: 10.1002/lt.25340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  18 in total

1.  Effective communication of standard errors and confidence intervals.

Authors:  Thomas A Louis; Scott L Zeger
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  A multivariate analysis of pre-, peri-, and post-transplant factors affecting outcome after pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sue V McDiarmid; Ravinder Anand; Karen Martz; Michael J Millis; George Mazariegos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims.

Authors:  A B Massie; L M Kucirka; L M Kuricka; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Split Liver Transplantation and Pediatric Waitlist Mortality in the United States: Potential for Improvement.

Authors:  Emily R Perito; Garrett Roll; Jennifer L Dodge; Sue Rhee; John P Roberts
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Comparison of liver transplantation outcomes from adult split liver and circulatory death donors.

Authors:  M Mallik; C J Callaghan; M Hope; P Gibbs; S Davies; A E Gimson; W J Griffiths; G J Pettigrew
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.

Authors:  S Feng; N P Goodrich; J L Bragg-Gresham; D M Dykstra; J D Punch; M A DebRoy; S M Greenstein; R M Merion
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Minimizing risk associated with elderly liver donors by matching to preferred recipients.

Authors:  Dorry L Segev; Warren R Maley; Christopher E Simpkins; Jayme E Locke; Geoffrey C Nguyen; Robert A Montgomery; Paul J Thuluvath
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Conventional split liver transplantation for two adult recipients: a recent experience in a single European center.

Authors:  Matteo Cescon; Gian Luca Grazi; Matteo Ravaioli; Giorgio Ercolani; Massimo Del Gaudio; Marco Vivarelli; Alessandro Cucchetti; Matteo Zanello; Gaetano Vetrone; Augusto Lauro; Antonio Daniele Pinna
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sue V McDiarmid; Ravinder Anand; Anne S Lindblad
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-07-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Deceased-donor split-liver transplantation in adult recipients: is the learning curve over?

Authors:  Ryan P Cauley; Khashayar Vakili; Nora Fullington; Kristina Potanos; Dionne A Graham; Jonathan A Finkelstein; Heung Bae Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  6 in total

1.  Split liver transplantation is utilized infrequently and concentrated at few transplant centers in the United States.

Authors:  Jin Ge; Emily R Perito; John Bucuvalas; Richard Gilroy; Evelyn K Hsu; John P Roberts; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Minimizing Risks of Liver Transplantation with Steatotic Donor Livers by Preferred Recipient Matching.

Authors:  Kyle R Jackson; Jennifer D Motter; Christine E Haugen; Jane J Long; Betsy King; Benjamin Philosophe; Allan B Massie; Andrew M Cameron; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Liver graft rejection following immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment: a review.

Authors:  Bo Hu; Xiao-Bo Yang; Xin-Ting Sang
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Survival Benefit of Split-Liver Transplantation for Pediatric and Adult Candidates.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Allan B Massie; Kathleen B Schwarz; Andrew M Cameron; Elizabeth A King; Dorry L Segev; Douglas B Mogul
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.112

5.  Ex Situ Dual Hypothermic Oxygenated Machine Perfusion for Human Split Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Adam M Thorne; Veerle Lantinga; Silke Bodewes; Ruben H J de Kleine; Maarten W Nijkamp; Joost Sprakel; Hermien Hartog; Wojciech G Polak; Robert J Porte; Vincent E de Meijer
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Minimizing Risks of Liver Transplantation With Steatotic Donor Livers by Preferred Recipient Matching.

Authors:  Kyle R Jackson; Jennifer D Motter; Christine E Haugen; Jane J Long; Betsy King; Benjamin Philosophe; Allan B Massie; Andrew M Cameron; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.385

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.