C Hernández1, A Lecube, R M Segura, L Sararols, R Simó. 1. Diabetes Unit, Endocrinology Division, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
AIMS: Several reports have implicated nitric oxide (NO) in the angiogenic process. The assessment of NO stable end products, nitrite and nitrate (NOx), is commonly used as a measure of NO production in biological fluids. The aims of the study were to investigate NOx concentrations in the vitreous fluid of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to evaluate the relationship between NOx and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum and vitreous fluid samples were obtained simultaneously at the time of vitreoretinal surgery from 23 patients with PDR, and 17 control non-diabetic patients with non-proliferative ocular disease. NOx was determined by using the Griess reaction and VEGF levels were assessed by ELISA. RESULTS: The intravitreous concentration of NOx was significantly elevated in patients with PDR in comparison with the control group (31.6 +/- 2.96 micromol/l vs. 18 +/- 2.46 micromol/l; P = 0.01). However, we did not detect any differences between NOx serum concentrations. We observed a correlation between serum and vitreous levels of NOx in diabetic patients (r = 0.79; P < 0.001), but not in the control group. Intravitreous levels of VEGF in patients with PDR were higher than those obtained in serum (1.42 ng/ml (0.12-7.62) vs. 0.12 ng/ml (0.03-0.42); P < 0.01). Vitreal levels of VEGF were strikingly higher in patients with PDR than in the control subjects (1.42 ng/ml (0.12-7.62) vs. 0.009 ng/ml (0.009-0.04); P < 0.001). No correlation between vitreal concentrations of NOx and VEGF was observed, either in diabetic patients or in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: NOx and VEGF are increased but not related in the vitreous fluid of diabetic patients with PDR. Our results suggest that serum diffusion could play a significant role in explaining the increase of NOx. By contrast, intraocular production seems to be the main factor responsible for the intravitreous enhancement of VEGF.
AIMS: Several reports have implicated nitric oxide (NO) in the angiogenic process. The assessment of NO stable end products, nitrite and nitrate (NOx), is commonly used as a measure of NO production in biological fluids. The aims of the study were to investigate NOx concentrations in the vitreous fluid of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to evaluate the relationship between NOx and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serum and vitreous fluid samples were obtained simultaneously at the time of vitreoretinal surgery from 23 patients with PDR, and 17 control non-diabeticpatients with non-proliferative ocular disease. NOx was determined by using the Griess reaction and VEGF levels were assessed by ELISA. RESULTS: The intravitreous concentration of NOx was significantly elevated in patients with PDR in comparison with the control group (31.6 +/- 2.96 micromol/l vs. 18 +/- 2.46 micromol/l; P = 0.01). However, we did not detect any differences between NOx serum concentrations. We observed a correlation between serum and vitreous levels of NOx in diabeticpatients (r = 0.79; P < 0.001), but not in the control group. Intravitreous levels of VEGF in patients with PDR were higher than those obtained in serum (1.42 ng/ml (0.12-7.62) vs. 0.12 ng/ml (0.03-0.42); P < 0.01). Vitreal levels of VEGF were strikingly higher in patients with PDR than in the control subjects (1.42 ng/ml (0.12-7.62) vs. 0.009 ng/ml (0.009-0.04); P < 0.001). No correlation between vitreal concentrations of NOx and VEGF was observed, either in diabeticpatients or in the control group. CONCLUSIONS:NOx and VEGF are increased but not related in the vitreous fluid of diabeticpatients with PDR. Our results suggest that serum diffusion could play a significant role in explaining the increase of NOx. By contrast, intraocular production seems to be the main factor responsible for the intravitreous enhancement of VEGF.
Authors: Leyi Gao; Jose S Pulido; R Mark Hatfield; Robert F Dundervill; Colin A McCannel; Scott A Shippy Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2006-11-13 Impact factor: 3.205
Authors: B Cameron Carr; Caitlyn E Emigh; Lea D Bennett; Andrew D Pansick; David G Birch; Chan Nguyen Journal: Retina Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Clemens Lange; Freya Mowat; Haroon Sayed; Manjit Mehad; Lucie Duluc; Sophie Piper; Ulrich Luhmann; Manasi Nandi; Peter Kelly; Alexander Smith; Robin Ali; James Leiper; James Bainbridge Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.467