Literature DB >> 12141345

Deriving a cochlear transducer function from low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Lin Bian1, Mark E Chertoff, Emily Miller.   

Abstract

In this paper, a new method is introduced to derive a cochlear transducer function from measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). It is shown that the cubic difference tone (CDT, 2f1-f2) is produced from the odd-order terms of a power series that approximates a nonlinear function characterizing cochlear transduction. Exploring the underlying mathematical formulation, it is found that the CDT is proportional to the third derivative of the transduction function when the primary levels are sufficiently small. DPOAEs were measured from nine gerbils in response to two-tone signals biased by a low-frequency tone with different amplitudes. The CDT magnitude was obtained at the peak regions of the bias tone. The results of the experiment demonstrated that the shape of the CDT magnitudes as a function of bias levels was similar to the absolute value of the third derivative of a sigmoidal function. A second-order Boltzmann function was derived from curve fitting the CDT data with an equation that represents the third derivative of the Boltzmann function. Both the CDT-bias function and the derived nonlinear transducer function showed effects of primary levels. The results of the study indicate that the low-frequency modulated DPOAEs can be used to estimate the cochlear transducer function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141345     DOI: 10.1121/1.1488943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  An analysis of cochlear response harmonics: Contribution of neural excitation.

Authors:  M E Chertoff; A M Kamerer; M Peppi; J T Lichtenhan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Changes in distortion of two-tone cochlear microphonic and otoacoustic emission signals during an acute endolymphatic hydrops in the guinea pig.

Authors:  W L Valk; H P Wit; F W J Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: amplitude modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Kelly L Watts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Displacements of the organ of Corti by gel injections into the cochlear apex.

Authors:  Alec N Salt; Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Hillary E Fitzgerald; Alec N Salt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Temporary hearing loss influences post-stimulus time histogram and single neuron action potential estimates from human compound action potentials.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Nicole M Scherrer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Changes in CMDP and DPOAE during acute increased inner ear pressure in the guinea pig.

Authors:  W L Valk; H P Wit; F W J Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.