Literature DB >> 12140331

An xrcc4 defect or Wortmannin stimulates homologous recombination specifically induced by double-strand breaks in mammalian cells.

Fabien Delacôte1, Mingguang Han, Thomas D Stamato, Maria Jasin, Bernard S Lopez.   

Abstract

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) are two alternative/competitor pathways for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To gain further insights into the regulation of DSB repair, we detail here the different HR pathways affected by (i) the inactivation of DNA-PK activity, by treatment with Wortmannin, and (ii) a mutation in the xrcc4 gene, involved in a late NHEJ step, using the XR-1 cell line. Here we have analyzed not only the impact of NHEJ inactivation on recombination induced by a single DSB targeted to the recombination substrate (using I-SceI endonuclease) but also on gamma-ray- and UV-C-induced and spontaneous recombination and finally on Rad51 foci formation, i.e. on the assembly of the homologous recombination complex, at the molecular level. The results presented here show that in contrast to embryonic stem cells, the xrcc4 mutation strongly stimulates I-SceI-induced HR in adult hamster cells. More precisely, we show here that both single strand annealing and gene conversion are stimulated. In contrast, Wortmannin does not affect I-SceI-induced HR. In addition, gamma-ray-induced recombination is stimulated by both xrcc4 mutation and Wortmannin treatment in an epistatic-like manner. In contrast, neither spontaneous nor UV-C-induced recombination was affected by xrcc4 mutation, showing that the channeling from NHEJ to HR is specific to DSBs. Finally, we show here that xrcc4 mutation or Wortmannin treatment results in a stimulation of Rad51 foci assembly, thus that a late NHEJ step is able to affect Rad51 recombination complex assembly. The present data suggest a model according to which NHEJ and HR do not simply compete for DSB repair but can act sequentially: a defect in a late NHEJ step is not a dead end and can make DSB available for subsequent Rad51 recombination complex assembly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12140331      PMCID: PMC137076          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkf452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  42 in total

Review 1.  Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break".

Authors:  R Rothstein; B Michel; S Gangloff
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  A novel role for the Bcl-2 protein family: specific suppression of the RAD51 recombination pathway.

Authors:  Y Saintigny; A Dumay; S Lambert; B S Lopez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Absence of DNA ligase IV protein in XR-1 cells: evidence for stabilization by XRCC4.

Authors:  M Bryans; M C Valenzano; T D Stamato
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-01-26       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Mammalian DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV.

Authors:  S E Critchlow; R P Bowater; S P Jackson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The XRCC4 gene product is a target for and interacts with the DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  R Leber; T W Wise; R Mizuta; K Meek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-01-16       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku autoantigen homologue affects radiosensitivity only in the absence of homologous recombination.

Authors:  W Siede; A A Friedl; I Dianova; F Eckardt-Schupp; E C Friedberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Cell cycle-dependent protein expression of mammalian homologs of yeast DNA double-strand break repair genes Rad51 and Rad52.

Authors:  F Chen; A Nastasi; Z Shen; M Brenneman; H Crissman; D J Chen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Characterization of homologous recombination induced by replication inhibition in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Y Saintigny; F Delacôte; G Varès; F Petitot; S Lambert; D Averbeck; B S Lopez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  DNA end-joining catalyzed by human cell-free extracts.

Authors:  P Baumann; S C West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Menage à trois: double strand break repair, V(D)J recombination and DNA-PK.

Authors:  P A Jeggo; G E Taccioli; S P Jackson
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.345

View more
  53 in total

1.  Possible anti-recombinogenic role of Bloom's syndrome helicase in double-strand break processing.

Authors:  Rosine Onclercq-Delic; Patrick Calsou; Christine Delteil; Bernard Salles; Dora Papadopoulo; Mounira Amor-Guéret
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Collaboration of homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining factors for the survival and integrity of mice and cells.

Authors:  Chrystelle Couëdel; Kevin D Mills; Marco Barchi; Lingbo Shen; Adam Olshen; Roger D Johnson; André Nussenzweig; Jeroen Essers; Roland Kanaar; Gloria C Li; Frederick W Alt; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Initiation of DNA double strand break repair: signaling and single-stranded resection dictate the choice between homologous recombination, non-homologous end-joining and alternative end-joining.

Authors:  Anastazja Grabarz; Aurélia Barascu; Josée Guirouilh-Barbat; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  The RNF138 E3 ligase displaces Ku to promote DNA end resection and regulate DNA repair pathway choice.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Jean-Philippe Gagné; Marie-Michelle Genois; Hilmar Strickfaden; Darin McDonald; Zhizhong Xu; Guy G Poirier; Jean-Yves Masson; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 5.  Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Moynahan; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  DNA-PKcs and ATM co-regulate DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Meena Shrivastav; Cheryl A Miller; Leyma P De Haro; Stephen T Durant; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-06-16

Review 7.  Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells.

Authors:  Andrea J Hartlerode; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Regulation of ceramide synthase-mediated crypt epithelium apoptosis by DNA damage repair enzymes.

Authors:  Jimmy A Rotolo; Judith Mesicek; Jerzy Maj; Jean-Philip Truman; Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman; Richard Kolesnick; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Fission yeast Rhp51 is required for the maintenance of telomere structure in the absence of the Ku heterodimer.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kibe; Kazunori Tomita; Akira Matsuura; Daisuke Izawa; Tsutomu Kodaira; Takashi Ushimaru; Masahiro Uritani; Masaru Ueno
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Regulation of the DNA Damage Response to DSBs by Post-Translational Modifications.

Authors:  C Oberle; C Blattner
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.