Literature DB >> 12139911

Women's perceptions of informed choice in maternity care.

Alicia O'Cathain1, Kate Thomas, Stephen J Walters, Jon Nicholl, Mavis Kirkham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to describe the extent to which women using maternity services perceive that they have exercised informed choice.
SETTING: twelve maternity units in Wales.
DESIGN: postal survey of women using maternity services, covering women's views of the extent to which they exercised informed choice overall, and at eight decision points during their care. PARTICIPANTS: 1386 women at approximately 28 weeks gestation (antenatal sample) and 1741 women at approximately 8 weeks post delivery (postnatal sample). MEASUREMENTS AND
FINDINGS: 54% of women perceived that they exercised informed choice overall in the antenatal sample (95% CI: 51-57%) and 54% overall in the postnatal sample (95% CI: 52-56%). Perceptions of informed choice differed by decision point, varying between 31% for fetal heart monitoring during labour and 73% for the screening test for Down's syndrome and spina bifida in the baby. There were differences by maternity unit, even when the characteristics of women attending these units were taken into account. Multiparous women, women from manual occupations and women with lower educational status were more likely to feel that they exercised informed choice during antenatal care. These sub-groups of women were also more likely to report a preference for not sharing decision-making with health professionals.
CONCLUSIONS: a large minority of women felt that they had not exercised informed choice overall in their maternity care. The perception of informed choice differed by decision point, maternity unit and characteristics of the woman. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: attaining informed choice is more of a challenge for some decision points in maternity care than others, particularly fetal monitoring. The difference in levels of informed choice between maternity units highlights the importance of maternity unit policy in the promotion of informed choice. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12139911     DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  11 in total

1.  Patient and provider perceptions of decision making about use of epidural analgesia during childbirth: a thematic analysis.

Authors:  Holly Bianca Goldberg; Allison Shorten
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

2.  Fetal monitoring: creating a culture of safety with informed choice.

Authors:  Lisa Heelan
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

3.  A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and knowledge of maternal obesity: Reflecting on their experiences of providing healthy eating and weight management advice to pregnant women.

Authors:  Mary T McCann; Lisa Newson; Catriona Burden; Jane S Rooney; Margaret S Charnley; Julie C Abayomi
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Informed decision making in maternity care.

Authors:  Holly Goldberg
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

5.  Differences between patient and provider perceptions of informed decision making about epidural analgesia use during childbirth.

Authors:  Holly Bianca Goldberg; Allison Shorten
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

6.  The lived experience of knowing in childbirth.

Authors:  Jane Staton Savage
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2006

7.  Birth control: to what extent do women report being informed and involved in decisions about pregnancy and birth procedures?

Authors:  Rachel Thompson; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Consumers attitudes and beliefs towards the receipt of antenatal corticosteroids and use of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  E L McGoldrick; T Crawford; J A Brown; K M Groom; C A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  I felt so much conflict instead of joy: an analysis of open-ended comments from people in British Columbia who declined care recommendations during pregnancy and childbirth.

Authors:  Kathrin Stoll; Jessie J Wang; Paulomi Niles; Lindsay Wells; Saraswathi Vedam
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  Womens' opinions on antenatal care in developing countries: results of a study in Cuba, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Argentina.

Authors:  Gustavo Nigenda; Ana Langer; Chusri Kuchaisit; Mariana Romero; Georgina Rojas; Muneera Al-Osimy; José Villar; Jo Garcia; Yagob Al-Mazrou; Hassan Ba'aqeel; Guillermo Carroli; Ubaldo Farnot; Pisake Lumbiganon; José Belizán; Per Bergsjo; Leiv Bakketeig; Gunilla Lindmark
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.