Literature DB >> 33858469

I felt so much conflict instead of joy: an analysis of open-ended comments from people in British Columbia who declined care recommendations during pregnancy and childbirth.

Kathrin Stoll1, Jessie J Wang2, Paulomi Niles3,4, Lindsay Wells5, Saraswathi Vedam3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No Canadian studies to date have examined the experiences of people who decline aspects of care during pregnancy and birth. The current analysis bridges this gap by describing comments from 1123 people in British Columbia (BC) who declined a test or procedure that their care provider recommended.
METHODS: In the Changing Childbirth in BC study, childbearing people designed a mixed-methods study, including a cross-sectional survey on experiences of provider-patient interactions over the course of maternity care. We conducted a descriptive quantitative content analysis of 1540 open ended comments about declining care recommendations.
RESULTS: More than half of all study participants (n = 2100) declined care at some point during pregnancy, birth, or the postpartum period (53.5%), making this a common phenomenon. Participants most commonly declined genetic or gestational diabetes testing, ultrasounds, induction of labour, pharmaceutical pain management during labour, and eye prophylaxis for the newborn. Some people reported that care providers accepted or supported their decision, and others described pressure and coercion from providers. These negative interactions resulted in childbearing people feeling invisible, disempowered and in some cases traumatized. Loss of trust in healthcare providers were also described by childbearing people whose preferences were not respected whereas those who felt informed about their options and supported to make decisions about their care reported positive birth experiences.
CONCLUSIONS: Declining care is common during pregnancy and birth and care provider reactions and behaviours greatly influence how childbearing people experience these events. Our findings confirm that clinicians need further training in person-centred decision-making, including respectful communication even when choices fall outside of standard care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care narratives; Childbirth; Declining care; Informed consent; Lived experiences; Person-centered care; Refusal of care; Respectful maternity care; Shared decision-making

Year:  2021        PMID: 33858469     DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01134-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  33 in total

1.  Attitudes of midwives in Sweden toward a woman's refusal of an emergency cesarean section or a cesarean section on request.

Authors:  Margaretha Danerek; Karel Maršál; Marina Cuttini; Göran Lingman; Tore Nilstun; Anna-Karin Dykes
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Informed consent and refusal in obstetrics: A practical ethical guide.

Authors:  Andrew Kotaska
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 3.  Twelve myths about shared decision making.

Authors:  France Légaré; Philippe Thompson-Leduc
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-07-03

4.  Person-centred shared decision making.

Authors:  Mark R Tonelli; Mark D Sullivan
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  The experiences of women, midwives and obstetricians when women decline recommended maternity care: A feminist thematic analysis.

Authors:  Bec Jenkinson; Sue Kruske; Sue Kildea
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 6.  Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy.

Authors:  Anne Drapkin Lyerly; Lisa M Mitchell; Elizabeth M Armstrong; Lisa H Harris; Rebecca Kukla; Miriam Kuppermann; Margaret Olivia Little
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.

Authors:  H Cahill
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.874

8.  A qualitative study of pharmacy nurse providers of community based post-birth care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Maria Zadoroznyj; Wendy Brodribb; Lauren Falconer; Lauren Pearce; Casey Northam; Sue Kruske
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Kelsey Martin; Nicholas Rubashkin; Sarah Partridge; Dana Thordarson; Ganga Jolicoeur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Women's experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Cassandra Yuill; Christine McCourt; Helen Cheyne; Nathalie Leister
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  3 in total

1.  A true choice of place of birth? Swiss women's access to birth hospitals and birth centers.

Authors:  Sebastian Rauch; Louisa Arnold; Zelda Stuerner; Juergen Rauh; Michael Rost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  From coercion to respectful care: women's interactions with health care providers when planning a VBAC.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Hannah Grace Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Advancing quality and safety of perinatal services in India: opportunities for effective midwifery integration.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Reena Titoria; Paulomi Niles; Kathrin Stoll; Vishwajeet Kumar; Dinesh Baswal; Kaveri Mayra; Inderjeet Kaur; Pandora Hardtman
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.547

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.