Literature DB >> 12137660

Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

C Forbes1, R Jepson, P Martin-Hirsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer world-wide. Increasing the uptake of screening, alongside increasing informed choice is of great importance in controlling this disease through prevention and early detection.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing uptake, and informed uptake of cervical cancer screening. SEARCH STRATEGY: Twenty-three electronic databases (to March 2000) were searched with no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or quasi-RCTs of interventions to increase uptake/informed uptake of cervical cancer screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data on study characteristics and quality were extracted independently by two reviewers. Where data were available, relative risks and 95% CI were calculated and a chi-squared test for heterogeneity was performed. MAIN
RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included (27 RCTs and eight quasi-RCTs). Heterogeneity between studies limited statistical pooling of data. Overall, however, invitations appear to be effective methods of increasing uptake. In addition, there is limited evidence to support the use of educational materials. The number and quality of included studies limited evidence regarding effectiveness of other interventions. Informed uptake of cervical screening was not considered by any studies. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: There was some evidence to support the use of invitation letters to increase the uptake of cervical screening. There was limited evidence to support educational interventions but it was unclear what format was most effective. The majority of the studies were from developed countries and so the relevance to developing countries is unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137660     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  24 in total

1.  Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What are the Implications for Moving Forward?

Authors:  Deborah Marshall; S Elizabeth McGregor; Gillian Currie
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Interventions that increase use of Pap tests among ethnic minority women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Jiyun Kim; Jong-Eun Lee; Haley K Hedlin; Heejung Song; Youngshin Song; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Decomposing income-related inequality in cervical screening in 67 countries.

Authors:  Brittany McKinnon; Sam Harper; Spencer Moore
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Breast cancer screening outreach effectiveness: Mammogram-specific reminders vs. comprehensive preventive services birthday letters.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Tracy Onega; Susan Brandzel; Melissa A Rabelhofer; Susan Carol Bradford; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Latina and Black/African American Women's Perspectives on Cancer Screening and Cancer Screening Reminders.

Authors:  Susan Brandzel; Eva Chang; Leah Tuzzio; Camille Campbell; Nora Coronado; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Susan Carol Bradford; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-11-18

6.  Missed opportunities for health education on Pap smears in Peru.

Authors:  Angela M Bayer; Lauren Nussbaum; Lilia Cabrera; Valerie A Paz-Soldan
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2011-04

7.  Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates.

Authors:  Janusz Kaczorowski; Stephen J C Hearps; Lynne Lohfeld; Ron Goeree; Faith Donald; Ken Burgess; Rolf J Sebaldt
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Financial arrangements for health systems in low-income countries: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Charles S Wiysonge; Elizabeth Paulsen; Simon Lewin; Agustín Ciapponi; Cristian A Herrera; Newton Opiyo; Tomas Pantoja; Gabriel Rada; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-11

Review 9.  Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review.

Authors:  J Austoker; C Bankhead; L J L Forbes; L Atkins; F Martin; K Robb; J Wardle; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.