Literature DB >> 26415962

Let it be? Pain control attempts critically amplify attention to somatosensory input.

Wouter Durnez1, Stefaan Van Damme2.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that the threat of pain may redirect attention towards specific features of the pain stimulus via attentional control settings. For instance, it has been shown that anticipating pain results in attentional prioritization of the location where pain is expected. In contemporary theories on attention and pain, it has been argued that pain control motivation-e.g., attempting to avoid pain-is capable of enhancing these effects. The present study investigated if the threat of pain prioritizes attention towards somatosensory input over other sensory information, and if pursuing a pain control goal augments this effect. In a Temporal Order Judgment experiment, 41 participants were presented with visuo-tactile stimulus pairs and asked to judge which stimulus they had perceived first. Half of all trials were associated with the threat of acute pain, while the other half was not. Furthermore, half of our sample was encouraged to avoid the administration of pain by means of a specified behavioral response, whereas the other half was not. In line with our hypotheses, we found the threat of pain to prioritize attention towards the somatosensory modality, i.e., participants tended to perceive the tactile stimulus as occurring earlier in time than the visual stimulus. Interestingly, in-depth analyses suggested that this effect was predominantly carried by participants who were engaged in pain control efforts. These findings support the idea that pain goals exert top-down attentional control prioritizing pain-relevant sensory information. Clinical relevance and future directions are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26415962     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0712-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  29 in total

1.  Selective attention to pain: a psychophysical investigation.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Deborah E Bentley; Nicola Phillips; Francis P McGlone; Anthony K P Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Hypervigilance to pain: an experimental and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Geert Crombez; Stefaan Van Damme; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  A neurocognitive model of attention to pain: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  Valéry Legrain; Stefaan Van Damme; Christopher Eccleston; Karen D Davis; David A Seminowicz; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Concurrent emotional pictures modulate temporal order judgments of spatially separated audio-tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Lina Jia; Zhuanghua Shi; Xuelian Zang; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Trying to fix a painful problem: the impact of pain control attempts on the attentional prioritization of a threatened body location.

Authors:  Wouter Durnez; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Impaired disengagement from threatening cues of impending pain in a crossmodal cueing paradigm.

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Chris Eccleston; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  The anticipation of pain at a specific location of the body prioritizes tactile stimuli at that location.

Authors:  Charlotte Vanden Bulcke; Stefaan Van Damme; Wouter Durnez; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 9.  Keeping pain in mind: a motivational account of attention to pain.

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Valéry Legrain; Julia Vogt; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Phasic and tonic pain differentially impact the interruptive function of pain.

Authors:  Christopher Sinke; Katharina Schmidt; Katarina Forkmann; Ulrike Bingel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  No Evidence for Threat-Induced Spatial Prioritization of Somatosensory Stimulation during Pain Control Using a Synchrony Judgment Paradigm.

Authors:  Wouter Durnez; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Emotional and Motivational Pain Processing: Current State of Knowledge and Perspectives in Translational Research.

Authors:  Susanne Becker; Edita Navratilova; Frauke Nees; Stefaan Van Damme
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  Attentional processing of itch.

Authors:  A I M van Laarhoven; S van Damme; A P M Lavrijsen; D M van Ryckeghem; G Crombez; A W M Evers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-06-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.