Literature DB >> 12134958

Sex specificity in methadone analgesia in the rat: a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approach.

Monica Rodriguez, M Angeles Carlos, Ignacio Ortega, Elena Suarez, Rosario Calvo, John C Lukas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify the extent to which a sex-specific dichotomy in the temporal evolution of the analgesic effect, after intravenous (i.v.) methadone injection in the rat, relates to the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) that mediate the dose-to-effect pathway.
METHODS: Tail-flick analgesia was measured after i.v. methadone injection (0.35 mg/kg) in female (n = 16) and male (n = 16) Sprague-Dawley rats. The PK were evaluated in separate female (n = 56) and male (n = 56) rats after they had received the same dose of methadone i.v. (0.35 mg/kg). A bicompartmental model described the kinetics and a sigmoid Emax model-related drug effect vs. simulated concentrations (pharmacodynamics) at the times of effect measurement. All model parameters as well as interanimal and assay variabilities were estimated with a mixed-effects population method using the program NONMEM.
RESULTS: The area under the effect-time curve (AUCE0-120) was (mean +/- interanimal SD) 1859+/-346 min in the females, which was significantly lower than the 4871+/-393 min in the males (P < 0.0001). On the contrary, the profiles of concentration vs. time were higher in females and, therefore, corresponded inversely to the effect vs. time-relative magnitudes. The central volume of distribution, V1, was 1.94+/-0.37 l/kg for female rats and 3.01+/-0.33 l/kg for male rats. Also, the central clearance was 0.077+/-0.006 l/min/kg and 0.102+/-0.005 l/min/ kg, respectively, for female and male rats. Both parameters differed significantly between sexes (P < 0.0001). The pharmacodynamic maximum observed effect parameter (Emax) was 37%+/-29% in female rats and 85%+/-16% in male rats, and these values were significantly different (P < 0.0001). The parameter for the concentration eliciting half of Emax (EC50) was 24.1+/-7.5 microg/l in female rats and 20.3+/-2.9 microg/l in male rats, and the Hill-related exponent, gamma, was 6.3+/-3.9 in female rats and 5.5+/-4.1 in male rats. These parameters did not differ significantly (at the P < 0.05 level).
CONCLUSIONS: A sex-specific dichotomy in the methadone antinociceptive effect, in the rat, was not proportionally related to plasma concentrations. Each sex corresponded to a distinct subpopulation of the PK parameters and one of the pharmacodynamic parameters (Emax). When the course of a drug involves PK or PD subpopulations, PK/PD modeling can afford the safest prediction of the effect-time evolution for a particular dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12134958     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016117218760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  53 in total

1.  The roles of P-glycoprotein and intracellular metabolism in the intestinal absorption of methadone: in vitro studies using the rat everted intestinal sac.

Authors:  R Bouër; L Barthe; C Philibert; C Tournaire; J Woodley; G Houin
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.748

2.  Analysis of animal pharmacokinetic data: performance of the one point per animal design.

Authors:  E I Ette; A W Kelman; C A Howie; B Whiting
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1995-12

3.  Gender-related differences in the antinociceptive properties of morphine.

Authors:  T J Cicero; B Nock; E R Meyer
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Brain and plasma levels of methadone and their relationships to analgesic activity of methadone in rats.

Authors:  S J Liu; D L Roerig; R I Wang
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 5.  Gender-related differences in pharmacokinetics and their clinical significance.

Authors:  E Tanaka
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 6.  An update on the clinical use of methadone for cancer pain.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; E Zecca; E Bruera
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Sex differences in morphine analgesia: an experimental study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E Sarton; E Olofsen; R Romberg; J den Hartigh; B Kest; D Nieuwenhuijs; A Burm; L Teppema; A Dahan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  The mu1, mu2, delta, kappa opioid receptor binding profiles of methadone stereoisomers and morphine.

Authors:  K Kristensen; C B Christensen; L L Christrup
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.037

9.  Methadone: radioimmunoassay and pharmacokinetics in the rat.

Authors:  G S Ling; J G Umans; C E Inturrisi
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Methadone concentrations in plasma and their relationship to drug dosage.

Authors:  K Wolff; M Sanderson; A W Hay; D Raistrick
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  2 in total

1.  A mechanistic model for the sex-specific response to nalbuphine and naloxone in postoperative pain.

Authors:  Smita Kshirsagar; Robert Gear; Jon Levine; Davide Verotta
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Sex differences in opioid analgesia and addiction: interactions among opioid receptors and estrogen receptors.

Authors:  Cynthia Wei-Sheng Lee; Ing-Kang Ho
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.395

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.