Literature DB >> 17943420

A mechanistic model for the sex-specific response to nalbuphine and naloxone in postoperative pain.

Smita Kshirsagar1, Robert Gear, Jon Levine, Davide Verotta.   

Abstract

We develop a mechanistic model for post-operative pain and apply it to describe the pharmacodynamic effects of the kappa-opioids nalbuphine and naloxone administered either alone or in combination in patients after surgical removal of one or more madibular third molar teeth. Data were obtained from 6 clinical studies in which a total of 304 patients were intravenously administered single doses of 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg of nalbuphine. Some groups also received 0.2 or 0.4 mg of naloxone. A total of 3,040 Visual analog scale (VAS) pain ratings were recorded at 20 min intervals for 3 h after drug administration. We used a two-site indirect action model to describe early and late pain and to incorporate the effect of nalbuphine and naloxone on pain over time. A mixed effects statistical model was used to account for inter- and intra-individual variability. Our model estimated the population average baseline pain score in men to be lower than that in women (68 vs. 76 mm on the 100 mm VAS scale). The model confirmed a late increase in pain (anti-analgesia) and estimated the lag time for the start of anti-analgesia to be 73 min after study drug administration. The maximum early phase pain score is 81.6 mm while the maximum anti-analgesia is 16.1 mm. The nalbuphine dose required to reduce early pain by 50% (ED(50)) was estimated to be 5.85 mg and the naloxone dose required to reduce late phase pain by 50% was estimated to be 0.5 mg. The model confirmed the results from conventional statistical analyses performed previously on individual studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17943420     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-007-9076-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  37 in total

1.  The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain.

Authors:  S I Revill; J O Robinson; M Rosen; M I Hogg
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 2.  Contribution to variability in response to opioids.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Hanks; Colette Reid
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic action of etodolac in patients after oral surgery.

Authors:  J Boni; J Korth-Bradley; K McGoldrick; A Appel; S Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  Potentiation of pentazocine analgesia by low-dose naloxone.

Authors:  J D Levine; N C Gordon; Y O Taiwo; T J Coderre
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  The expected effect of a combination of agents: the general solution.

Authors:  M C Berenbaum
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1985-06-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Absence of nalbuphine anti-analgesia in the rat.

Authors:  Sachia G Khasar; Robert W Gear; Jon D Levine
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Dose ratio is important in maximizing naloxone enhancement of nalbuphine analgesia in humans.

Authors:  Robert W Gear; Newton C Gordon; Christine Miaskowski; Steven M Paul; Philip H Heller; Jon D Levine
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Selective antagonism of opioid analgesia by a sigma system.

Authors:  C C Chien; G W Pasternak
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Sex specificity in methadone analgesia in the rat: a population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic approach.

Authors:  Monica Rodriguez; M Angeles Carlos; Ignacio Ortega; Elena Suarez; Rosario Calvo; John C Lukas
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Increased analgesic potency of mu agonists after continuous naloxone infusion in rats.

Authors:  C A Paronis; S G Holtzman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  4 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for the sedative effects of flibanserin in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Iñaki F Trocóniz; Katja Boland; Alexander Staab
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Nalbuphine, a non-controlled opioid analgesic, and its potential use in research mice.

Authors:  Heather Lyons Narver
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 3.  Strategies for Developing κ Opioid Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Pain with Fewer Side Effects.

Authors:  Kelly F Paton; Diana V Atigari; Sophia Kaska; Thomas Prisinzano; Bronwyn M Kivell
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Activation of the trigeminal α2-adrenoceptor produces sex-specific, estrogen dependent thermal antinociception and antihyperalgesia using an operant pain assay in the rat.

Authors:  Subodh Nag; Sukhbir S Mokha
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.332

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.