Literature DB >> 10504600

Comparison of computer-assisted instruction and seminar instruction to acquire psychomotor and cognitive knowledge of epistaxis management.

M M Carr1, R K Reznick, D H Brown.   

Abstract

Epistaxis is a common problem faced by primary care physicians. Typically, first-hand experience with this problem is not obtained in medical school. A computer learning module was developed to address practical management of epistaxis. It was evaluated by use of third-year clerks and compared with an interactive seminar based on the same material. Fifty-eight students doing their required otolaryngology rotations were randomly separated into 3 groups: (1) doing a preinstruction test, (2) using the computer module, and (3) participating in a small-group seminar. All participants were tested with a short written test and a practical test that involved performing anterior nasal pack placement in a model patient. Percentage scores for the 2 groups were compared by use of t tests, and there was no significant difference between the written, practical, or combined scores at a level where P = 0.05. This study shows that basic patient management and a simple procedure can be taught as effectively with a computer module as with a small-group interactive seminar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10504600     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70233-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

1.  Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

Review 2.  A systematic review of the methodological quality and outcomes of RCTs to teach medical undergraduates surgical and emergency procedures.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Rodney Crutcher; Diane Lorenzetti
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter?

Authors:  Anderson Spickard; Nabil Alrajeh; David Cordray; Joseph Gigante
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Realist synthesis of educational interventions to improve nutrition care competencies and delivery by doctors and other healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Victor Mogre; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Fred Stevens; Paul Aryee; Mary Gemma Cherry; Tim Dornan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Offline Digital Education for Medical Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.

Authors:  Bhone Myint Kyaw; Pawel Posadzki; Gerard Dunleavy; Monika Semwal; Ushashree Divakar; Vasilis Hervatis; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Can a multisensory teaching approach impart the necessary knowledge, skills, and confidence in final year medical students to manage epistaxis?

Authors:  George Kurien; Vincent L Biron; Chase Campbell; David Wj Cote; Kal Ansari
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10-09

7.  Training of clinical reasoning with a Serious Game versus small-group problem-based learning: A prospective study.

Authors:  Angélina Middeke; Sven Anders; Madita Schuelper; Tobias Raupach; Nikolai Schuelper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.