Literature DB >> 22403775

Peer review: past, present, and future.

M Castillo.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22403775      PMCID: PMC7964625          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication.

Authors:  Drummond Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The history of the peer-review process.

Authors:  Ray Spier
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Leanne Tite; Andrew Hutchings; Nick Black
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  To blind or not to blind? What authors and reviewers prefer.

Authors:  Glenn Regehr; Georges Bordage
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Nick Black; Stephen Evans; Fiona Godlee; Lyda Osorio; Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F Godlee; C R Gale; C N Martyn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Evidence on peer review-scientific quality control or smokescreen?

Authors:  S Goldbeck-Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02

8.  Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial.

Authors:  S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; N Black; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-01-02
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The impact factor.

Authors:  Guido Wilms
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.

Authors:  E E O'Connor; M Cousar; J A Lentini; M Castillo; K Halm; T A Zeffiro
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Peer review: concepts, variants and controversies.

Authors:  Wilfred Cg Peh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.331

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.