Literature DB >> 12122530

Influences on physicians' choices of intravenous colloids.

Michael S Miletin1, Thomas E Stewart, Peter G Norton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Controversy over the optimal intravenous fluid for volume resuscitation continues unabated. Our objectives were to characterize the demographics of physicians who prescribe intravenous colloids and determine factors that enter into their decision to choose a colloid.
DESIGN: Questionnaire with 61 items. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: Ten percent ( n = 364) of frequent intravenous fluid prescribers in the province of Ontario, Canada.
RESULTS: The response rate was 74%. Colloid use in the past year was reported by 79% of the responding physicians. Important reasons for choosing a colloid included blood loss and manipulation of oncotic pressure. Physicians tended to prefer either albumin or pentastarch, but no important reasons were found for choosing between the two. Albumin with or without crystalloid was preferred in 5/13 scenarios by more than 50% of the respondents, whereas pentastarch was not favored by more than 50% of respondents in any scenario. Physicians practising in critical care areas and teaching hospitals generally preferred pentastarch to albumin. Physicians reporting pentastarch as representing greater than 90% of total colloid use were more likely to have been visited by a drug detailer for pentastarch than those who used less synthetic colloid (54 vs 22%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of physicians surveyed prescribe colloid products and the reported use of albumin and pentastarch has a bimodal distribution. Although albumin appeared to be preferred in more clinical niches, most physicians did not state reasons for choosing between products. Marketing, specialty, location of practice and clinical scenario appear to play significant roles in the utilization of colloid products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12122530     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1337-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  15 in total

1.  Impact of albumin compared to saline on organ function and mortality of patients with severe sepsis.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Suzanne McEvoy; Rinaldo Bellomo; Colin McArthur; John Myburgh; Robyn Norton
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Fluid resuscitation in neonatal and pediatric hypovolemic shock: a Dutch Pediatric Society evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Nicole Boluyt; Casper W Bollen; Albert P Bos; Joke H Kok; Martin Offringa
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Resuscitation fluid use in Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Units between 2007 and 2013.

Authors:  N E Hammond; C Taylor; M Saxena; B Liu; S Finfer; P Glass; I Seppelt; L Willenberg; J Myburgh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Are renal adverse effects of hydroxyethyl starches merely a consequence of their incorrect use?

Authors:  Christiane S Hartog; Frank M Brunkhorst; Christoph Engel; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Maximilian Ragaller; Tobias Welte; Evelyn Kuhnt; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  The Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial: protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of fluid resuscitation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) compared to 0.9% sodium chloride (saline) in intensive care patients on mortality.

Authors: 
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Therapeutic hypertension: principles and methods.

Authors:  David J Powner; Joseph M Darby; John W Crommett; Robert L Levine
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-08-14       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Preferred plasma volume expanders for critically ill patients: results of an international survey.

Authors:  Frédérique Schortgen; Nicolas Deye; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The risk associated with hyperoncotic colloids in patients with shock.

Authors:  Frédérique Schortgen; Emmanuelle Girou; Nicolas Deye; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; Bette Liu; Colman Taylor; Rinaldo Bellomo; Laurent Billot; Deborah Cook; Bin Du; Colin McArthur; John Myburgh
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Effect of intraoperative HES 6% 130/0.4 on the need for blood transfusion after major oncologic surgery: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Godinho Zampieri; Otavio T Ranzani; Priscila Fernanda Morato; Pedro Paulo Campos; Pedro Caruso
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.